Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Sport’

Günter Behnisch obituary

July 19th, 2010 The Sheet No comments

Experimental German architect who put his stamp on the Munich Olympics

The German architect Günter Behnisch, who has died aged 88, produced two national monuments – the Munich Olympics of 1972 and the short-lived Bonn parliament of the early 1990s – but the bread and butter of his Stuttgart firm was a long line of humane and progressive social buildings, including schools, colleges and old people's homes, built mainly in south-west Germany. Commissions came mostly through the competition system, and the firm's repeated successes led to Behnisch designs and presentation techniques being imitated across the nation in the 1980s and 90s.

Identifying the Behnisch style is not easy, as the work covered a wide range and changed quickly, but it was always experimental and forward-looking, and never hampered by conscious conformity to a contrived manner. Works such as the University Library, at Eichstätt, notable for its angular, layered planning, and the Hysolar Institute in Stuttgart (both 1987) were dubbed "deconstructivist", but shared little with other deconstructivist work, though the label identifies some cross-cultural threads.

Behnisch himself preferred to speak of Situationsarchitektur, an architecture that responds to place and circumstances, and which focuses attention more on specificities than generalities. He was outspoken about the need for variety and individuality, for clear articulation of building elements and legibility of spaces, for keeping technical disciplines at bay and tolerating accidents and imperfection. All this had a distinguished German ancestry in the work of the alternative, or "organic", modernism of Hans Scharoun and Hugo Häring, whose influence Behnisch acknowledged. The lack of an easily identifiable style also reflects how the firm worked, always with multiple authorship. Behnisch was no "signature architect" and in his later years did not draw, preferring to encourage creativity in others. He employed students fresh from university with their idealism intact, developing their designs through encouragement and criticism and, if necessary, defending them from technical or bureaucratic pressures.

There is nothing unusual in a principal giving design opportunities to younger architects, but inexperience tends to produce naive or mediocre results, not the consistently high standard and extraordinary inventiveness shown by Behnisch's office. He had the knack of guiding developing ideas quickly and a nose for talent. It was in some ways like an academy – and he had experience there, too, holding a chair at Darmstadt University of Technology from 1967. His presence as leader, figurehead and father of the office was crucial. Young architects who came to work for him tended to stay for three or four years before moving on, some starting their own practices. Several leading German practices, including Auer & Weber and Kauffmann Theilig, splintered off from Behnisch.

He was born in Lockwitz near Dresden, and grew up in Chemnitz. His father was a schoolteacher and social democrat. Along with everyone else in his class, Behnisch joined the Hitler Youth. A schoolfriend's relation was a naval officer, so at the outbreak of war, they chose the navy and Behnisch enrolled as a submariner, rising late in the war to the rank of commander – an extraordinary responsibility for a man just into his 20s. When I asked him about the accuracy of the film Das Boot, he commented merely that they had made it too exciting; the reality was mostly boring.

In 1945, he surrendered his submarine in Norway, and was sent to a PoW camp in Northumberland. It was there, under the influence of a former assistant of Paul Schmitthenner, that his interest in architecture was kindled, and he determined to pursue it on his release, studying at Stuttgart from 1947. In that city he remained, working briefly for Rolf Gutbrod, architect of the Liederhalle in Stuttgart, before setting up his own practice in 1952.

The early work was mainly schools, sometimes site-specific and traditional in construction, such as Stuttgart's Vogelsangschule, sometimes more repetitive and construction-dominated such as the Hohenstaufen Gymnasium in Göppingen. The obsession of the period was system-building, and Behnisch began using prefabricated concrete with the firm Rostan, developing a sophisticated system applied to many schools. It was fast, but too repetitive, and less economical than had been hoped. By 1965, he had rejected the whole direction as a blind alley for ceding too much of architecture's potential to the disciplines of construction and failing on the human side.

From then on, the work was more open, playful, informal and increasingly irregular. His big breakthrough was the Munich Olympics. At the height of the Wirtschaftswunder (economic miracle) and under the liberal spirit of 1968, the Federal Republic needed to show a democratic and egalitarian face in contrast with Hitler's monumental Berlin Olympics of 1936. The site, north-west of the city, had been the dump for wartime rubble. Behnisch and his team reshaped it as a landscape, absorbing spectator seating into the slopes and adding an artificial lake. To avoid large boxy halls, tent-like hanging roofs were proposed at an unprecedented scale, Frei Otto being called in as adviser.

Engineering was stretched to new limits and much experimental work had to be done in a limited time, but Behnisch kept his nerve and the Olympics gained its most distinguished modern setting, with an afterlife as a popular park. This work led to many smaller sports buildings through the 1970s and 80s, often associated with the dozens of schools which remained the firm's staple diet. The scale is always humane, natural light ubiquitous, and entrance halls double as assembly and exhibition spaces. The evolution is best seen at Lorch, where three parallel schools date from 1969, 1973 and 2002, respectively polygonal, triangular and circular in plan. There were urban projects, particularly the important but relatively invisible replanning of Stuttgart's Schlossplatz (1973-1980) and the transport interchange at Feuerbach (1992).

Encounters with central urban buildings began with the offices for the charity Diakonisches Werk in 1983. Confined within an inherited masterplan of crushing dullness, it protests its individuality with a courtyard, projecting bays, balconies, sunshades and social rooms. Such an approach was later accepted even by big banks for their HQs, such as the Landesgirokasse in Stuttgart of 1998 and the Norddeutsche Landesbank in Hanover of 2002.

The one Behnisch building we were promised in Britain, a concert hall for Bristol in 1998, "would have been a masterpiece and ... the only public building in England designed and built by a visiting European architect," according to Richard Burton of ABK architects, but it was "cut short by a lack of understanding of its importance and significance". The last major building in which Behnisch had much personal involvement was Berlin's Akademie der Künste on Pariser Platz (completed in 2005) where he had to fight tooth and nail against a conservative planning policy demanding stone facades with regular window holes. He argued that as a public building it should be open and welcoming, and that formal conformity could be obtained in other ways.

In old age he became incapacitated by illness, and gradually handed over the office to his son, Stefan, who has taken it in new directions with an emphasis on sustainability and new work in the US. Behnisch is survived by his wife, Johanna, Stefan and two daughters, Sabine and Charlotte.

• Günter Behnisch, architect, born 12 June 1922; died 12 July 2010


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

World Cup stadiums in South Africa

May 31st, 2010 The Sheet No comments

Five stunning new stadiums have been built in South Africa, and another five refurbished, in preparation for the World Cup next month. Take a look around


Anish Kapoor’s tangled tower at the heart of London 2012

April 1st, 2010 The Sheet 1 comment

Artistic centrepiece of the 2012 Olympic Park will be slightly taller than Big Ben and the Statue of Liberty

It will be slightly taller than Big Ben and the Statue of Liberty, just short of the Great Pyramid of Giza and considerably shorter than the structure to which it is being compared – the Eiffel Tower. And even though it is still just a computer-generated model, it is already gathering nicknames: the Colossus of Stratford, perhaps, or the Hubble Bubble.

The official title, however, will be the ArcelorMittal Orbit and it was yesterday unveiled as the £19.1m artistic centrepiece of the 2012 Olympic Park. Designed by artist Anish Kapoor and structural engineer Cecil Balmond, the 115 metre-tall red steel tower will dominate the east London landscape and become, it is hoped, a permanent visitor attraction for generations to come.

Most of the money for it – £16m – is being provided by the steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal, Europe's richest man, while the remainder will come from the Greater London Authority.

Boris Johnson conceded that some people would say that "we are nuts, we are barmy in the depths of a recession to be building Britain's biggest ever piece of public art". But the mayor said the Olympic park had needed something extra to arouse "the curiosity and wonder" of Londoners and visitors.

The idea is that 700 people an hour will be able to use lifts to reach a viewing platform offering spectacular views over London. If they wish, they can then walk back to the ground on a looping stairway.

Kapoor and Balmond's Orbit, which will be placed between the aquatics centre and the main stadium, was chosen from a shortlist of three, beating tower-based bids by the artist Antony Gormley and the architects Caruso St John.

Johnson said he got Mittal on board as a result of a chance meeting in a cloakroom at the World Economic Forum in Davos. He spent 40 seconds outlining the concept and Mittal immediately said he would provide the steel. In total, 1,400 tonnes will be required for a build that will begin soon and is due for completion in November 2011.

Johnson is well aware that the public may baptise it differently to its given name. "Some may choose to think of it as a Colossus of Stratford, some eyes may detect a giant treble clef, a helter-skelter, a supersized mutant trombone. Some may even see the world's biggest ever representation of a shisha pipe and call it the Hubble Bubble. But I know it is the ArcelorMittal Orbit and it represents the dynamism of a city coming out of recession, the embodiment of the cross-fertilisation of cultures and styles that makes London the world capital of arts and culture."

Big symbolic London visitor attractions have a mixed history. The Brunels' Victorian Thames Tunnel was a big hit but never made money and is now used by tube trains. The Festival of Britain Skylon was toppled on the orders of Winston Churchill and made into ashtrays. The London Eye has had much more success.

It is yet to be decided whether people will be charged to go up the tower butthere will be revenue-generating opportunities for the GLA and Mittal from a restaurant on the viewing platform.

Kapoor called it "the commission of a lifetime". He said he and Balmond were referencing the Tower of Babel and trying to convey a sense of instability and a tower that could be viewed differently from different parts of the city. "It is an object that needs a journey, a journey around the object but also up and through the object. It needs real participation and engagement."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Notes and queries: Why is Doctor Who always a Time Lord and not a Lady?

March 8th, 2010 The Sheet No comments

Why is Doctor Who always a Time Lord and not a Lady? Journeys to the centre of the Earth; The meaning of a hiding to nothing

Why is Doctor Who always regenerated as a Time Lord, not a Time Lady?

In Doctor Who the process of regeneration is the renewing of every cell in a Time Lord's dying, damaged or unwanted body. Since Time Lords (and Time Ladies, and perhaps even Time Tots, as the children of Gallifrey are known) can change species when they regenerate, there is presumably no reason why they can't also swap sex. There's certainly nothing in the TV series' history to contradict this theory and indeed no way of telling whether the Master, the Doctor's sworn enemy, spent one or more of his 13 wasted lives as a femme fatale called the Mistress. 

Kieran Grant, London N22

Time Lords can be male or female. One of Tom Baker's companions was actually a female Time Lord called Romana who regenerated between seasons and I also understand that one of his recurring enemies was another female of the species called The Rani.

Apparently, the only way a Time Lord can regenerate as a member of the opposite sex is to commit suicide. This has happened at least once to my knowledge, in a Doctor Who Unbound audiobook called Exile, where he commits suicide and becomes Arabella Weir in order to hide from pursuers.

Guy Thomas, Canterbury

Why the Doctor has never managed to exchange his Y chromosome for a second X is one of the universe's great unsolved mysteries. Had he managed to do so, we might have been fortunate enough to experience the doctorly delights of the likes of Honor Blackman, Judi Dench, Sheila Hancock, Maggie Smith or Kathy Burke. Whatever the reasons for such rigid gender typecasting, lack of available talent isn't one of them.

Sheila Kirby, Esbjerg V, Denmark

The world's tallest building is the 828m Burj Dubai, but what is the world's deepest man-made structure?

Various mines and deep geological repositories for nuclear waste approach one kilometre. At 24.5km, Norway's Laerdal tunnel is the longest road tunnel in the world, and also up to 1400 metres deep. However, the record for the deepest hole is held by the Russians, who started drilling the Kola Superdeep Borehole in 1970 and reached the depth of 12,261 metres in 1989. The purpose of this hole is to study the continental crust. However, this represents only about 0.2% of the journey to the centre of the Earth.

In a tongue-in-cheek paper published in the science journal Nature, David Stevenson, professor of planetary science at Caltech, explains how a grapefruit-sized unmanned probe could reach the centre of the earth in a week or so. The first step would be to detonate a nuclear bomb to generate a crack in the Earth's crust 30cm wide and several hundred metres long and deep. Molten iron containing the probe would need to be poured into the crack the instant it formed. Being denser, the iron would sink, which would lead to the release of gravitational potential energy, melting the underlying rock. Once the glob of iron had passed, the rock would close up again. Data would be sent to the surface as vibrations. But the £6.5bn price tag means it will not be happening any time soon.

Mike Follows, Willenhall, W Midlands

"A hiding to nothing" – I know what it implies but it doesn't make sense. Can anyone explain?

It refers to a situation where one has everything to lose and nothing to gain. It is used (often in football) to describe a contest against supposedly inferior opposition where winning would be expected and produce little credit, while losing would be a calamity. The hiding refers not so much to the other team's performance but to the public outcry and humiliation.

The meaning of "hiding" is from the association of corporal punishment with the tanning of skins. Hence, "I'll tan your hide" and "give you a good hiding". So winning the uneven contest would be "nothing", while losing would be a "hiding".

Martin Skinner, Leamington Spa, Warks

Why are there no female Formula One drivers?

Due to their ancestors' roles as (respectively) hunters and nurturers, men's and women's brains evolved different pathways to help them make decisions. Women specialised in more nuanced, longer-term decisions, while men learned how to make good instant decisions. It's a bit of a generalisation, and there are obviously exceptions – the female Red Arrow, for instance, and the men who work in caring professions – but together with their numerical advantage, it explains why men become (and want to become) racing drivers and fighter pilots.

Nick Marsh, Sutton-at-Hone, Kent

Any answers

In folklore werewolves look like real wolves. That's the whole point – you don't know which is real and which is supernatural until it's too late. So why in films and TV do they look like very hairy people?

Susan Deal, Sheffield

What is the origin of the mortarboard as an item of academic dress? Why is it worn by graduates at some universities but not at others?

Lilian Dunlop, Manchester

Send questions and answers to nq@guardian.co.uk. Please include name, address and phone number.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

London waves hello to Zaha Hadid’s Olympic centrepiece

November 11th, 2009 The Sheet No comments

• Frame of aquatic centre's roof is now in place
• £10m is pledged to get more women playing sport

The wavy roof of the distinctive aquatics centre that Olympic organisers hope will house a string of British medal winners, including Rebecca Adlington, was revealed today, as £10m in lottery funding was poured into persuading more women to follow her lead.

Swimming is the number one participation sport among women, and Adlington is one of the stars who organisers, who brought the Olympics to London partly on the promise of leaving a legacy of sports participation, hope will help inspire more physical activity among women.

The unveiling of the framework for the sweeping 160-metre roof on the £244m aquatics centre, designed by Zaha Hadid, is seen as a key moment in the Olympic Delivery Authority's "big build". During the games the centre will house two 50-metre pools, a 25-metre diving pool and 17,500 spectators.

Amid a sea of functional designs, the ODA hopes the centre will act as an inspiring "gateway to the games", the first thing many visitors to the Olympic park will see as they exit Stratford International station. The roof structure, which will now be covered by aluminium, has taken since March to lift into place.

The £10m in funding announced today by Sport England will be concentrated on projects that encourage take-up among women from disadvantaged communities, and helping women with children under 16 play more sport.

"In both those areas, they experience barriers where money and carefully targeted support can make a real difference," said Sport England's chief executive, Jennie Price.

Sports minister Gerry Sutcliffe said: "Our sportswomen have had a bumper year and I hope the successes of stars like Jessica Ennis and the England women's cricket team will inspire more women across the country to make that important first step. There is a sport out there for everyone and this investment will help clubs reach out to women who haven't found theirs yet."

At present, fewer than one in eight women regularly play sport in England. One in five men play sport regularly and the gender gap is growing, according to Sport England figures.

"What we have to do is make it easy, accessible and attractive, and to try and play to the kind of things women will be interested in – things you can do in a group and things that have a strong social dimension are really attractive to most women," said Price.

The aquatic centre building, originally budgeted at £73m, will be reduced to a 3,500-capacity venue after the games. Sport England contributed £40m to the funding of the venue, partly to ensure it had moveable floors making it suitable for community use after the games. But some local boroughs are still angry that it will not contain a leisure pool.

Today's £10m funding round is the second to be announced this year, with the first targeted at encouraging sport in rural areas. The funding is on top of the £480m over four years that Sport England is investing through sport governing bodies. It has faced some criticism for failing to make much progress towards its government target of getting one million more people playing sport three or more times a week by 2013. Its latest progress will be measured by the third annual "active people" survey, published next month.

According to Sport England, swimming is the favourite participation sport among women, followed by athletics, cycling, equestrian sports and badminton.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds