Posts Tagged Media
MediaCityUK wins a building prize
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on October 14, 2011
Manchester's MediaCityUK may be unpopular with certain BBC staff required to travel "up north", but the city takes great pride in the place.
Last night the Salford Quays complex was awarded building-of-the-year prize by Greater Manchester chamber of commerce.
That will be more welcome than the trophy it picked up last month, the Carbuncle Cup, which was awarded by the magazine Building Design.
Phil Cusack, chairman of the chamber's property and construction committee, said the development was "of national economic significance."
He added: "MediaCity will contribute to the economic well-being of Salford, Manchester and the region for generations to come. This award recognises its importance in terms of the immense contribution it is already making."
Source: TheBusinessDesk
Untangling the Web: Home
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on September 28, 2011
Home sweet (online) home.
This weekend's Untangling the Web column explodes the concept of "home": difficult to define but easy to recognise, "home" is as different from "house" as "space" is different from "place".
More than just semantics, environmental psychologists have been trying to define the nuances between the emotionally warm and fuzzy home as distinct from the pragmatic, physical house since the end of WWII. And interaction designers have spent two decades trying to get us to make their websites our homes online.
How has the 20 years of the Web transformed what we think and feel about the concept of home? Global migration and near-ubiquitous connectivity (in many major metropolises, at least) has helped to differentiate between the physical structure and the emotional component, but as Kat Jungnickel and Genevieve Bell ask in this research paper (abstract only), is home really where the hub is?
Send your thoughts and home experiences to aleks.krotoski.freelance@guardian.co.uk, comment below or tweet @aleksk with #home and #uttw.
Guardian archive, 1960: BBC Television Centre unveiled. Pride in vast new ‘factory’ of TV
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 17, 2011
Originally published in the Guardian on 16 June 1960
"An industrial building - a factory - the largest, best equipped, and most carefully planned factory of its kind in the world." This was how the B.B.C.'s great television centre at the White City was described by Mr Gerald Beadle, director of B.B.C. television, in a speech yesterday when the press was taken on a tour of the centre, which will go into operation when Studio 3 gives its first production on June 29.
Mr Beadle said the building was equipped to make about 1,500 hours of electronic programme material each year. "The B.B.C. makes more programmes and buys less from outside sources than does any other television authority . . . The new centre is the principal world centre for electronic programmes . . . we who have made this industry from scratch are aware of immense opportunities for this country if British television is allowed a period of unhampered development."
The centre has taken ten years to get to its present stage. It has seven studios in all. There is a circular main block covering three and a half acres with studios, engineering areas and administrative offices; a scenery block; and a restaurant block. The works block and an extension have yet to be built. In all, the centre will cover about thirteen acres. The entrance hall has a striking mural in mosaic by John Piper. Inside the circular block, which is like a huge hollow drum, there is a grass lawn, a fountain and a golden statue of Helios. Yesterday the statue glinted golden in the June sun and the waters of the fountain echoed against the walls of the circular building. The biggest studio, No. 1, measures 11,000 square feet and part of its floor can be lowered and converted into a pool with water if wanted; this will come into use early next year. Studio 3, to open on June 29, measures 8,000 square feet and can hold an audience of 400. Studio 1 can hold 600. Dressing rooms, make-up and wardrobe rooms are arranged so that the cast for different studios can identify their respective quarters by different colours - red, blue, and green.
The main building is seven floors high and at the top there is a circular roof walk from which there is an impressive view down into the inner ring. Something of the size can be gauged when one realises that this block covers an area nearly twice that of St Paul's Cathedral. Yet this building, so impressive for its sheer size, strikes one inside by the intricacy, the delicacy and the fine adjustment of its engineering set-up. The impression one is left with is that whatever comes out of here to be seen on the small screen will be of the highest quality.
How Television Centre started with a question mark
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 13, 2011
Design of iconic building famously drawn on the back of an envelope
Monty Python's Flying Circus was recorded at BBC Television Centre. The comedy featured Tarquin Fin-tim-lin-bin-whin-bim-lim-bus-stop-F'tang-F'tang-Olé-Biscuitbarrel, a Silly Party candidate in a spoof of the 1970 general election, and Vivian Smith-Smythe-Smith, a participant in the Upper Class Twit of the Year contest. It also gave us wartime RAF chaps unable to follow one another's banter.
Was it possible the Pythons knew a thing or two about the design history of TV Centre? This impressive broadcasting complex was the architectural brainchild of Graham Dawbarn, a first world war Royal Flying Corps pilot, his business partner Air Commodore Henry Nigel St Valery Norman, 2nd Baronet of Honeyhanger, and the BBC's resident civil engineer, Marmaduke Tudsbery Tudsbery. Sir Nigel, as the baronet was better known, was killed in action in the second world war, but not before he and Dawbarn masterminded a number of civil airports: the BBC White City studios were surely rooted in the design of hangars and other airport buildings as was the easy flow of space between them.
Exactly how the complex should be planned, and what it should look like, however, was still something of a puzzle when Dawbarn and Tudsbery got to grips with the design in the late 1940s. Famously, the architect drew a question mark on an envelope (it still exists) and, one way or another, this punctuation mark formed the basis of the plan offering a circle (or circus) of production spaces and studios penetrated by an access road for the delivery and shifting of scenery, sets and props. The design proved to be outstanding, both functional and instantly recognisable.
Some said TV Centre looked a bit too Soviet for comfort at a time – the 1950s – when Auntie Beeb herself was thought to be sheltering communist sympathisers. As a matter of record, Tudsbery visited the workers' paradise in 1966, publishing a 22-page book, In the Red: Two Weeks in the USSR, on his return.
First shown to the public at the Festival of Britain in 1951, the design was meant to have been added to as and when necessary. Today, though, it will be hard to think of a suitable new purpose for the listed buildings at White City. Sensible, and perhaps even some quite silly, suggestions may well be welcome to ensure a bright and possibly creative future for one of British broadcasting's finest and most memorable circuses.
The Apple has landed: Steve Jobs’ plans for futuristic new campus
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 10, 2011
Steve Jobs gave a masterclass in how to charm your local council planning meeting this week, personally presenting for 20 minutes on its ambitious plans for a new headquarters in Cupertino.
The small Californian town, which is part of the patchwork of cities that make up the sprawl of Silicon Valley, has become synonymous with Apple, which employs 2,800 people at the base on Infinity Loop.
With a very different persona to the one we see at Apple's product announcements, Jobs was authoritative but humble, and personal enough to give anecdotes about growing up in Cupertino. He was also disturbingly thin and at times seemed breathless, and when one councillor asked on Apple's no-smoking policy he snapped: "Both my parents died from lung cancer, so i'm a little sensitive on that topic."
The vision of a vast, circular building is designed to impress. Jobs told the council that through its experience building retail stores, Apple has developed a specialism in building the biggest curved pieces of glass in the world for architectural use. Jobs, who has a summer job as a teenager at Hewlett Packard when it used own the land, said there used to be apricot trees on the site and wants to plant apricot orchards. The 150-acre site will be 80% landscaped, he said.
Ground breaking will start next year and the campus will be finished by 2015.
It will be four storeys high, hold around 12,000 people and have its own auditorium. Perhaps future WWDCs will be held here, instead of the Moscone Centre? "We put on presentations, much like we did yesterday, but we have to go to San Francisco to do them."
One councillor asked how Cupertino residents will benefit from Apple's new campus in the city. "Well, as you know we're the largest tax payer in Cupertino and we'd like to continue to stay here and pay taxes. If we can't then we have to go somewhere else like Mountain View and we'll take our current people with us and the city's largest tax base would go away." He added that Apple employs a lot of talented people who end up being affluent members of the community.
Couldn't Apple at least provide free wifi, suggested the councillor? "I'm a simpleton," said Jobs. "I think we pay taxes and the city should do those things. If we can get out of paying taxes then I'd be glad to put up wifi. I think we bring a lot more than free wifi."
"I think we do have a shot at building the best office building in the world. I think architecture students will come here to see this."
Roger Scruton is on shaky ground slating modern architecture
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on April 14, 2011
The philosopher should heed his admired Wittgenstein and keep schtum on subjects he knows little about
Philosophers through the ages have rarely had much to say about architecture. Perhaps they've been wise to keep quiet, for architecture can only truly be understood by experiencing its physicality, rather than whatever theory might underpin it.
In an opinion piece in the Times, the philosopher Roger Scruton launched a rabble-rousing attack on celebrity architects – such as Daniel Libeskind, Frank Gehry, Richard Rogers, Norman Foster, Zaha Hadid, Peter Eisenman and Rem Koolhaas – who build monuments for themselves, and indulge in overblown discourse to justify buildings that will be torn down in 20 years' time.
These "stars", thundered Scruton, author of The Classical Vernacular: Architectural Principles in an Age of Nihilism and I Drink Therefore I Am: A Philosopher's Guide to Wine, "have equipped themselves with a store of pretentious gobbledegook with which to explain their genius to those who are otherwise unable to perceive it". Scruton continued: "New architecture ... is designed to stand out as the work of some inspired artist who does not build for people but sculpts space for his own expressive needs." Such buildings called to the philosopher's mind "vegetables, vehicles, hairdryers, washing machines or backyard junk". All this "is designed as a waste: throwaway architecture, involving vast quantities of energy-intensive materials, which will be demolished within 20 years".
This is amusing stuff, but neither truthful – truth being the goal of the philosopher – nor helpful. Professor Scruton has presumably never heard Foster speak, nor conversed with Hadid. The former is a lucid and analytical mind and Hadid – for all her scintillating and voluptuous buildings – is, like Foster, remarkably down to earth. This is their great strength as architects: again, their trade is as physical and commonsensical as philosophy can be metaphysical and arcane.
The point – one that Ludwig Wittgenstein, a thinker admired by Scruton, understood well – is that certain ideas, such as aesthetics, cannot be put adequately into words and are best expressed through demonstration, which is exactly what architects do. Equally, Scruton is on very shaky foundations when he accuses contemporary architects of sculpting space for their own expressive needs. What of Borromini, Guarini, Vanbrugh, Hawksmoor and any number of baroque masters? Their magnificent, theatrical creations were no less expressive than those of Gehry and Hadid. And they too were curbed by the demands of clients, budgets and other practical considerations: neither now nor then have architects been free to let rip in the way Scruton imagines.
As for endurance, Scruton might like to tour any number of Foster buildings – some 40 years old – that have stood the test of time. Yes, architects may make mistakes, but many contemporary buildings are built just as well and even better than those dating from Scruton's beloved 18th century, when shoddy workmanship and fast-buck building was common.
If modern architecture is so very bad, what would Scruton prefer we build instead? The philosopher proposes that new works should be by contemporary classical architects such as Robert Adam from Winchester and Quinlan Terry of Dedham, who "have learned how to construct buildings that fit so well into their surroundings that you notice them only in the way you notice friendly people in the street". While this is certainly not true of works such as Adam's outlandish neo-Egyptian 198-202 Piccadilly, it is also a flimsy recommendation in general. Did the Greeks intend the Parthenon to fit all but unnoticed into its surroundings? Was the dome of St Paul's the shrinking violet of 17th-century English architecture?
Architecture is a continuum – an art and science that has developed, sometimes in fits and starts, since it emerged in monumental form in Mesopotamia some 6,000 years ago. Its underlying philosophy is expressed in the design, making and experience of buildings themselves. Perhaps this is why it has attracted the thoughts of so few professional philosophers. Roger Scruton is a perceptive thinker and can write beautifully, but faced with buildings he finds incomprehensible he sounds like the Alf Garnett of architectural theory. In this case he might best learn from Wittgenstein, who helped design a house in Vienna in the late 1920s that was impossible to live in, and who famously said: "Whereof one cannot speak, one must pass over in silence."
The new BBC Broadcasting House: So what does £1bn buy?
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on January 27, 2011
It was 10 years in the making, it cost a fortune and it lost its architect along the way. But the BBC's new Broadcasting House is finally finished. Jonathan Glancey gets an early look inside
This is a daunting, vaulting space. I am standing in the News Room of the BBC's gleaming and much-talked-about new building. With its vast pillars, spiralling staircases, and towering lift shafts painted red and orange, this cavernous, boldly modern space seems more like a submarine dock, the sort of place you might expect a James Bond shoot-out to take place, rather than somewhere for Huw Edwards to calmly read the news.
The News Room may take up most of the basement and ground floor of the main wing of the £1bn new addition to Broadcasting House, but it is a surprisingly bright space, thanks to the fact that its glass ceiling is all but invisible, vanishing into the crevice-like atrium. The effect is striking, although the experience of looking up from a desk might be a little vertiginous: let's hope Jeremy Paxman doesn't develop a crick in his neck. The idea is to induce a sense of drama and urgency into the building and so, I suppose, into the news operation – dramatic and urgent enough, you would have thought, without the need for help from architecture.
Over the last 10 years or so, amid rising controversy, the BBC has spent £1.04bn refurbishing and extending its ocean-liner-like HQ in central London. Although it is still being fitted out, the new-look Broadcasting House, three linked buildings clustered around a new public courtyard, is now pretty much complete. In 2013, some 5,000 journalists, programme-makers, managers and other staff will be shipped here from historic BBC buildings elsewhere, including Television Centre in Shepherd's Bush and Bush House in Aldwych, home of the World Service. The aim of this eye-popping expenditure is to bring TV, radio and online operations together, increasing efficiency while reducing costs, by getting rid of a plethora of properties across town.
As well as being refurbished, the original art deco Broadcasting House, designed by George Val Myer and home to BBC radio since it opened in 1932, has gained a muscular, Portland stone and glass-clad wing. Not only does it house offices and studios, it also faces All Soul's Church, a splendidly elegant Regency creation by John Nash. To the north sits the massive news and studio complex, a dramatic hub containing the News Room; its interior is destined to become highly familiar, as it will serve as a backdrop to the likes of Nick Robinson, Hugh Pym and Stephanie Flanders bringing you the news – and giving you a hint of where at least some of that billion pounds has gone. Visitors will be able to watch news gathering in action from a glazed gallery above.
The News Room certainly packs a punch: tiers of glazed offices surround it from great heights, some floors reached by those balletic spiral stairs crafted in oak, glass and steel. There is direct access from there to six new TV studios, suspended on enormous steel springs, designed to counteract vibrations caused by the Bakerloo Line.
The project has quite a history. It had been mooted when John Birt was the BBC's director-general in the 1990s, but finally took shape in 2002, after a much-heralded architectural competition when Greg Dyke was at the helm. Since then, Mark Thompson has taken over, while the original architects – MacCormac Jamieson Prichard (MJP), a medium-sized practice best known for high-quality designs for colleges – were replaced in 2005 by experienced corporate giant Sheppard Robson. Costs have risen, completion dates have been extended, and the BBC's reputation as an architectural client has been damaged.
What happened was that the BBC, reflecting its position as a nurturer of the arts, wanted to spark its very own architectural renaissance. Then, at some point, management decided it had been aiming too high; costs were cut, ambitions lowered. This hit the News Room hardest. MJP's original design was sensational: a magnificent space supported and framed by enormous tree-like columns, with branches spreading around the room, to even out the load of all the floors above. It had the look of the command centre of an intergalactic spaceship, even though MacCormac was making references to revered architects such as John Soane, as well as dreaming up the future. It would have been a thrilling place not just to work in but to look into – from above, or from the comfort of your own living room. The problem was that this was a demanding design. The BBC wanted compromise, and the architect refused. Richard MacCormac went, bound to silence.
The artwork you can walk over
What stands there now may well be practical, and doubtless works, yet it's hard not to feel that the heart of the building was ripped out before it had even started to beat. Still, Sheppard Robson maintain their design sits very much on the shoulders of MacCormac's. Lucy Homer, project architect, says the scheme is essentially MJP's original. But was the loss of MacCormac's News Room, the project's defining space, a way of cutting corners? "No," she says. "I worked on both schemes. The MJP News Room was special. But it would have been a much darker space. It would have needed a lot of artificial lighting. What we've tried to do is concentrate on what works best in terms of construction and in ways staff and visitors will use the buildings."
The look of the News Room, all shining steel and glass with accents of bold colour, spreads out to the floors above and beyond. The overall feeling is of a sleek corporate HQ, but one with a huge technical plant set within, where things – in this case programmes – are made. Bureaucracy and broadcasting: it's a very BBC combination.
Because the public pays for the BBC, the new Broadcasting House has been made accessible, in no uncertain manner. Not only will the public be able to gaze into the News Room, they will also be able to attend concerts, and see an ambitious collection of artworks incorporated into the buildings. In fact, the courtyard is itself an enormous work of art. Called World, and created by Mark Pimlott, an artist loved by architects, the £1.6m piece has a surface that curves gently, like that of the Earth. This is crisscrossed with mosaic lines of longitude and latitude, and engraved with place names from around the world, echoing the BBC's motto: "Nation shall speak peace unto nation."
This is just the start. On top of the new wing facing All Soul's Church is Breathing, by Jaume Plensa, a Spanish artist. Costing £900,000, this inverted glass-and-steel cone beams light into the night sky and represents, says the BBC, the spirit of broadcasting, while also serving as a memorial to journalists killed while on assignment.
Although there has been criticism of this arts programme, commissioned for the BBC by the public arts agency Modus Operandi, the corporation believes it has a duty to promote and encourage art, which is why it maintains orchestras as well as buildings such as the original Broadcasting House, adorned with sculpture by Eric Gill. In this, the BBC is very different from rival broadcasters such as BSkyB.
Is it worth £1bn? Well, the whole project could certainly have been conceived with greater style, tact and efficiency. Although not the truly inspirational building the BBC dreamed of, the new Broadcasting House will probably come to be seen as an imposing yet functional HQ. You could argue that the uncertainty of its architecture perfectly reflects the uncertainty of the BBC, as it battles to stay ahead in the digital age.
• This article was amended on 27 January 2011. The original referred to vibrations caused to the building by the Jubilee Line. This has been corrected.
The BBC’s new Broadcasting House – in pictures
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on January 24, 2011
Take a look at the BBC's controversial and dramatic £1bn extension of its central London headquarters
Inside the revamped BBC Broadcasting House
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on December 16, 2010
Corporation unveils £1bn redevelopment of central London base, including high-tech newsroom
Why pop-ups pop up everywhere
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on October 12, 2010
Temporary shops and restaurants were once a way for artists to subvert empty urban spaces. Now, they're just as likely to be part of a corporate marketing strategy
In a dark, dank nightclub beneath some railway arches, with the clatter and chug of trains overhead, I am having a minor Proustian moment. This London club was last open in the late 1990s, and its smell sends me straight back to that era, my student days: to Britpop and Blur, late-teenage clinches, 70p for a vodka and Coke. The aroma is strong, sour, specific, but it won't linger here for very much longer.
Over the last few weeks this long-abandoned club has been taken over by a group of young event organisers for an ambitious, 99-day pop-up project called Counter Culture. The programme will deliver photographers and DJs, comedians and poets, art exhibitions and parties, a different lineup each night, spiriting this sprawling, downtrodden building straight into the 21st century. One of the four organisers, 23-year-old Lee Denny, meets me at the door, apologises for his moustache ("I'm not trying to look cool, I promise") and shows me around the venue he first discovered when he came to an underground party here.
Denny has some experience of pop-ups: five years ago, he started his own small music festival, LeeFest, in his back garden, and he still runs it each summer, albeit from a larger venue. He leads me into the smaller of the club's two main rooms, kitted out with old, over-stuffed sofas and a much more expertly stuffed fox head. The artist responsible for the fox only works with roadkill, says Denny, and he's particularly excited about a live taxidermy workshop she's going to be running.
We move on through a small changing room, where a pair of grubby grey y-fronts hangs from a high ledge, and out to the main stage. On the opening night, in late September, the club filled up with 980 people, "and musicians kept arriving," says Denny, "people who remembered the place, and had heard about what we were doing. There was Jazzie B from Soul II Soul, and Suggs from Madness. He said 'Have you got a trombone?' and then he got up on stage and was like," he holds one hand to his mouth and slides a fist deliberately through the air, "rum-pa-pum-pum-pum."
Counter Culture is just one of thousands of pop-up events that have opened in the UK and beyond over the last few years – ranging from the small to the large, the cool to the rubbish, the sublime to the ridiculous. There have been pop-up shops, restaurants and gardens; pop-up galleries– one in an abandoned Woolworths in Leytonstone – and cinemas – Tilda Swinton even carted one around the Scottish Highlands. There have been pop-up gigs in launderettes; restaurants in front rooms; films projected in disused petrol stations or on to hay bales in fields.
Those are the more guerrilla projects, the grassroots events, often put together on a wing, a prayer and a stiflingly small bank loan. But alongside these are the corporate-backed pop-ups, the temporary shops and bars and restaurants that appear with increasing regularity, often hosted by well-known venues.
The Double Club in London in 2008, a part-Congolese, part-western restaurant and bar backed by fashion label Prada, was particularly successful. A branch of Central Perk, the coffee shop from the TV series Friends, which opened in London's Soho for a fortnight last year, was used to promote a limited-edition box set of the series. In 2006, Nike opened a shop in New York for four days, selling a special edition basketball shoe at $250 a pair. Gap has used a school bus, kitted out with merchandise instead of seats, as a travelling pop-up shop in the US.
There have been pop-up projects that have opened for an hour, like Mary Portas's vintage clothes sale in 2008, and others so successful that they've eventually become a permanent fixture, such as Tom Dixon's Dock Kitchen restaurant in Portobello Dock in west London. But what unites these disparate projects is essentially a strong fascination with the temporary, with the here-today-and-gone-tomorrow, the idea of excitement, urgency and a dynamic interaction with urban (and it is usually urban) spaces. These are projects that stand in opposition to clone towns, to the idea of uniformity and unending drabness.
The debut of pop-up businesses is often traced back to 2004, when Rei Kawakubo of the cutting-edge fashion brand, Comme des Garçons, set up a temporary shop in a disused building in Berlin. Realistically though, while the "pop-up" description might be fairly new, the idea is as old as the hills. The current craze has echoes in everything from the restaurants traditionally run in people's homes in Cuba to the shop that artists Sarah Lucas and Tracey Emin opened in London for six months in 1993, where they made and sold mugs and T-shirts and ashtrays.
The artist Dan Thompson set up his first pop-up gallery with friends in a bakery in Worthing in 2001; he now runs the Empty Shops Network, which advises artists who hope to start projects in one of the country's many disused high-street stores. (It's estimated that 13% of all UK shops are currently empty – and that one in five of those may never be used again.) He says that his inspiration comes from the magical curiosity shops that have appeared for centuries in fiction, "which no one can ever quite find again. I love creating something that's gone so quickly that people say afterwards: 'Was that you? Did that happen?' I love that excitement that you can create in a town, that sense of – what's coming next?"
While these businesses have counter-cultural roots, there's no doubt they've become a corporate concern. As Ali Madanipour, professor of urban design at Newcastle University says, there are two key readings of pop-ups, which aren't mutually exclusive. One is that they can be "a positive way of making more intensive use of urban space," he says, "bringing life to parts of the city that are under-used – they can provide space for local activity, civil-society events, impromptu gatherings. But on the other hand, they can also be an aid to consumerism, in which brands create a stage setting, adding colour and texture to the general mall atmosphere that is the backdrop to many of our urban spaces. Pop-up businesses support shopping – they bring a festival atmosphere to shopping."
The exclusivity of pop-up events means those that are ticketed often sell out extremely quickly. Denny says he now finds it "impossible to get excited about a new place that's opening indefinitely – you think, 'Oh yes, I'll go to that at some point' and you end up there in 20 years. Whereas if it's temporary it's like: 'We've got to do it right now.'"
When pop-ups are hosted by established businesses, this exclusivity and popularity can lead to obvious rewards for both host and brand. Over the last few weeks, the London restaurant Meza has been hosting a MasterChef pop-up, with former contestants from the TV show cooking for diners at a cost of £49 for three courses. When I went there last week, the atmosphere was loud, buzzy, excitable – obviously good for the restaurant, and good publicity for MasterChef. It apparently sold out in 72 hours.
One of the attractions of pop-ups for businesses is that they can act as an informal, unacknowledged market research project. Last week the smoothie maker Innocent ran a pop-up event in London called the Five for Five cafe – offering a two-course meal designed to deliver five portions of fruit and veg for £5. Dan Germain, head of creative at Innocent, said that the event, held in a disused tramshed, was "a no-brainer. Put on a bit of a party for the people who buy the drinks, meet and hang out with them, and find out stuff you wouldn't discover in some weird research group . . . You get all these charts and graphs that say your customer is a certain age, that they live in a certain place, do a certain thing, and then you see the real people. We could just loiter in Sainsbury's by the fridges and watch the people who come and buy our drinks, but we'd probably get kicked out."
Like the MasterChef event, the Innocent cafe sold out quickly, and was cleverly run – the cavernous space was dressed with fairy lights, fruit trees and herbs on every table; there was friendly service, and good food. Any pop-up event this well thought out, prompting this much goodwill, is clearly an excellent piece of marketing.
Germain says a pop-up event is better value for money than running an advertising campaign. "You're getting a more intense return," he says. "Fewer people, yes, but you're hopefully forging relationships that will last a lifetime." Their pop-up event also enabled them to communicate their brand in an incredibly strong, concentrated way. "Everything we want to do was under that roof," he says. Their core message was literally: "up on the back wall, written in big letters: Eat your greens."
Stephen Zatland, a partner at management consultancy Accenture, says that pop-up businesses give retailers other benefits which might not be immediately obvious to the consumer. It's a chance, he says, "to try out a new store location, to see if the kind of people they want to attract will start flocking there before they invest in a permanent site. Manufacturers can try out new products, new services, deliver them direct to the customer, promote a new brand, or try and re-invigorate an older brand".
And they can carry out all this research and promotion for a relatively low price. Zatland says that compared to opening a permanent site, pop-ups are fairly inexpensive. The recession, with its surfeit of empty shops, has played a key role in this trend. "When a lot of Woolworths stores became available, for instance, retailers picked up on those and rented them for a short period to try out something new on the high street."
The pop-up trend has been so big, for so long, that there have been whispers that it must be about to fizzle and die. But Zatland suggests this is unlikely. "There's another interesting trend for a more permanent kind of feature," he says, "where there's a site for maybe eight different pop-up stores, and the content of that site will rotate, change, every eight weeks, or every three weeks. That will be good, I think, because it encourages customers to keep coming back to see what the new feature is."
When I ask Thompson about the corporate fashion for pop-ups, about the way they're being used to flog us more unnecessary stuff, I expect him to be disdainful. But it's quite the opposite. "I love it," he says, "I love the fact that such a daft idea, started by artists, has taken over. I went to a pop-up Gucci put on, and it was fantastic. It's like Quentin Crisp said – don't keep up with the Joneses, drag them down to your level. We've completely subverted all these great brands, who are now having to think differently, more creatively, and that has to be good for our town centres."
There's no doubt that pop-ups can aid regeneration and make a genuine difference. As Thompson points out, "if you live somewhere the size of Worthing or Coventry or Carlisle or Margate, and you lose a few shops, you really notice it. If that's your home town, and you're passionate about it, you'll fight to make it better."
Horton Jupiter (whose real name, he jokes, is "Mystic Rock") is less positive about some aspects of the pop-up phenomenon. He has been running a cafe called The Secret Ingredient from his front room in Newington Green, London, for over a year now, and says he prefers the term "home restaurant", because pop-up has "become something that people use as a marketing tool". He appreciates the temporary, impromptu nature of pop-ups, but projects like his, he suggests, are meant to be precisely an escape from capitalism, from the robot on the end of the phone, towards something more illicit, subversive, personal and warm.
For landlords whose properties have been empty for a while, these events are a great way to promote their building, bring people flooding back in, and perhaps get some free maintenance and decorating work done too. Thompson says he's never "paid anything more than a peppercorn rent – we cover business rates, we cover insurance, and in every shop we've been to we've left it in a better condition than we found it. We'll give it a lick of paint, a clean and tidy. We took a shop in Shoreham-by-Sea, initially for six months, but now for another six, and a place that had been derelict for 10 years has been completely refurbished – which has led to two other derelict shops nearby coming back into use as well."
Where artists go, corporations follow. And so does gentrification, as areas blossom, flourish and improve - and rents subsequently head skywards. Perhaps now, at a time of deep economic anxiety and trouble, we should just enjoy the most exciting of the pop-ups, those that bring life to depressed corners, flowers to abandoned skips, the flicker of film to the hollow beneath an underpass.
There is something slightly sinister about the marketing guile – and rampant consumerism – behind some of these projects, but many are straightforwardly brilliant, and there seems no shortage of people happy to get involved. "Every time I walk past an empty shop or building," says Denny, "I think: I've got to do something in there, I just have to! If I had time, every empty space that was remotely intriguing would be filled."