Posts Tagged Exhibitions
Turner Contemporary: ‘A pure art space’ – video
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on April 9, 2011
Turner Contemporary, designed by architect David Chipperfield, is a new cultural centre on Margate's seafront inspired by JMW Turner's legacy in the town. Jonathan Glancey talks to the architect about the imposing structure ahead of its opening
James Stirling, the architect who divides opinion
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on April 1, 2011
Along with Norman Foster and Richard Rogers, James Stirling was regarded as part of a British architectural renaissance. Have his reputation, and buildings, stood the test of time?
James Stirling divides opinion: architects love him, while those who use his most notorious buildings loathe him. Or that's how it used to be. The abiding image is of young German and Japanese architects unloading from their coaches, peering in through the great glass wall of Cambridge's History Faculty Building and snapping away frenetically, while students and staff trapped in the cage froze or fried, according to the season. Later, the monumental Staatsgalerie in Stuttgart redeemed Stirling's reputation among the art-loving élite.
Nineteen years after his death, the forthcoming exhibition at the Tate will no doubt further redraw the balance in his favour. Stirling's thumbnail drawings, his doodles and overlays, his worm's-eye and bird's-eye views from queer angles, are works of art in themselves. Coupled with the usual photographs and models, they will confront a fresh generation with the guts and resourcefulness of this most controversial of British architects.
But architectural exhibitions, however comprehensive, are essentially a substitute. Slick presentation perspectives and preciously hoarded sketches can mislead. To get the true measure of any architect's work you have to see it, smell it, hear it, and walk around both inside and outside. Stirling, never a two-dimensional designer, is no exception.
The Clore Gallery addition to the Tate's Millbank building, where the show is to be, is hardly the place to start, as Stirling is at his most staid there. Better to begin in the scruffier back streets of Camberwell in London. Here squats an enigma of a building, four-square and raised up on a grass ramp to give its only storey force and presence. Three single-pitch roofs fly upwards in contrary directions, culminating in big windows. The fourth quarter of the square is flat-roofed, with a chimney poking up at the corner. No more than a humble dining hall and kitchen, it stands aloof from everything around, even the demure brick school which it serves. It is a jagged, angry little thing, probably impractical, yet once seen, never forgotten.
Brunswick Park School's dining hall dates from 1961–62. It is a rare early work of Stirling and Gowan, the firm where James Stirling made his reputation. Next came the commission that put the pair on the map, Leicester University's Engineering Building. Then the History Faculty Building at Cambridge, over which James Gowan parted from Stirling – the first of many troubles to overwhelm that project. Gowan's career stalled after the split. He has never been reconciled to Stirling's unwillingness to acknowledge his creative role in their architecture. Whatever the truth, there is no doubt that Stirling's strongest work – Brunswick Park, Leicester, and some early flats at Ham Common – was all done with the exacting Gowan. It's to be hoped he will get the full credit due him in the Tate show.
What were the two young Scotsmen trying to achieve in the 60s and what made their architecture angry? The answer lies in the tight rein restraining British architects in the immediate postwar years. The public sector, now a spent force in architecture, was dominant. Like almost everyone who had talent, even Stirling spent a short spell working for the London County Council. Architecture was meant to be about social service, producing the best housing and schools affordable in an age of austerity. It was a noble vision, democratic and modernist, but it was the vision of puritans.
Stirling was not a puritan. A hard-driving, hard-drinking womaniser, he was a mixture of brutal and sensitive, kindly and selfish, greedy and funny. He had all the charm and confidence that architects must have to win jobs, but lacked any grain of social sensibility. His goal was to be a great architect, and sod almost everything else. In short he was a charismatic monster, as artists often are. But the special thing about architecture is that it is a science as well as an art. If you treat it just as science, you will be ignored. If you treat it just as art, it may well pay you back.
Today when engineers can twist structures to any shape an architect likes, it's hard to recreate the impact made by the Leicester Engineering Building in 1962. Hitherto most modern British architecture had been dour, colourless and rectangular. Here it went wild. A pair of red-tiled lecture theatres barge outwards. The bigger one looks to be sitting on glass, with its end propped up on an odd pair of poles. A ramp climbs between them at a third, bewildering angle. Lopsided over the big auditorium rises a dainty office tower, glass-clad with canted corners. On the laboratories behind, the rooflights are skewed weirdly to catch the best daylight – a brainwave of the engineer Frank Newby, a force in the design along with Stirling and Gowan. It is a tumultuous, exuberant performance, sometimes comic, sometimes perverse.
Russian constructivism, Italian futurism, the Johnson Wax Building of Frank Lloyd Wright are all in there, along with the modernist idea that a building's different functions should all be seen. Stirling was always an eclectic, drawing from wherever he liked without respect for his sources. But Leicester's exact pedigree matters little. It is the outcome of the peculiarly British cultural rebellion of the early 60s, when the young called time on austerity and came out to play as wildly and brashly as they could.
Most experimental buildings have problems. Leicester's had to do with acoustics, and the performance of the cheap glazing then available. They paled into nothing compared with the débâcle of the Cambridge History Faculty Building. Stirling was on a roll after Leicester, keen to push the language of shock he and Gowan had just invented, and disinclined to investigate the brief or revisit the design when circumstances changed. A library, as the new commission largely was, offers more technical challenges than an engineering building. Stirling, no technician, was flushed with the ebullience of success. One of Gowan's reasons for breaking with his partner was the Stirling's determination to go on with a design in which the Gowan had no faith. There was a suspicion too that the truculent Stirling despised his donnish clients. Certainly he despised Hugh Casson, whose Raised Faculty Building adjoins the site. Asked why he ignored the context, he said "to fuck Casson", a remark that raced round the Cambridge common rooms.
The upshot was trouble from the moment work started on site. After years of bickering and some talk of demolition, it had to be almost entirely reconstructed. If all buildings that fail badly were to damage their architects' reputation, then that of Le Corbusier, always cavalier with technology, would be dead and buried today. Stirling's mistake was to build sloppily in Cambridge, and then to compound things with his Florey Building at Oxford, where impracticalities were again countenanced for the sake of form. Making enemies in places where opinion-formers chatter has consequences. After that there were no further bold red-tile-and-glass buildings. Indeed, for years there were no further Stirling buildings in Britain at all.
Stirling was too proud to admit his mistakes, but he felt the criticisms bitterly and he learnt. He mellowed, married and to a degree relaxed. From the 70s the practical side of his architecture was delegated to his associate and second partner, Michael Wilford. After that, his buildings usually worked. For first ideas he came to rely on the many talented assistants who flocked to his office just as the commissions dried up. The strongest of these, such as Leon Krier and John Tuomey, loved the fun, irreverence and eccentricity of working for Stirling. A born teacher through force of personality, he could pick up someone else's idea, make a deft improvement here or there, and give it his imprimatur. Despite the veneer of individualism which stars such as Stirling conjure up, that is how architectural design works. Nearly always it is a collective affair.
The style changed too. When post-modernism arrived, Stirling jumped on the bandwagon. His architecture stopped being clipped and wiry and grew monumental and fat (as Stirling did himself). But it was never quite pompous, as the rebellious streak was irrepressible. The building always held out as proof of his continued stature is the Stuttgart Staatsgalerie. Its completion in 1984 marked the end of Stirling's lean years and the start of a second, largely international career.
The Staatsgalerie is a building of sequences and effects: of ramps, a glass wall which switches for the hell of it from vertical to sloping, and a fine circular sculpture courtyard, followed by some ordinary, efficient toplit galleries. There are moments of grandeur and panache and naughtiness, but you cannot walk round and take in the strange juxtapositions together as you can at Leicester. The constructivist idea of letting everything hang out has been dropped, never to recur. While the early edginess has gone, it is not replaced by any sense of wholeness or repose, which is what monumental architecture calls for.
The most divisive aspect of Stuttgart and of Stirling's later architecture is the postmodern affectation of its stone cladding, in pseudo-Italian stripes. Some like it, others find it ponderous and tasteless. Stairs, spatial transitions, shocks and surprises were Stirling's forte. Textures were not, nor was colour, as the Clore Gallery curators discovered. Grisly purples and greens abound in his later work. Architects are colour-blind curiously often, and Stirling's rebarbative purple hosiery should have been a warning.
Through strength of character, Stirling had recovered from adversity. The hunger for success and recognition was still there, along with the focus and the energy. But despite the plaudits he never recaptured the freshness of his early designs. Take a look at his final major British building, No 1 Poultry, built as the last word in the notorious Mansion House Square saga and not completed till 1998, well after Stirling's death. It's certainly more suitable than the Mies van der Rohe glass box which Lord Palumbo long fought to erect on this sensitive site. It tries to respect its neighbours, and plays some post-modern tricks in an attempt to reduce its bulk. But it is miles from being a masterpiece. In some contexts only suavity and refinement are good enough; jokes and cranky touches will not do. One can only lament the pretty little Victorian buildings that gave way to this elephant.
In the last major exhibition in London to feature Stirling (in 1986), he was presented along with Norman Foster and Richard Rogers as one of three great symbols of a British architectural renaissance. Looking back now at the romantic bravura of Piano & Rogers' Pompidou Centre or the consummate control of Foster's Stansted Airport, it must be said that Stirling now looks much the smallest of the three. A fearless experimentalist, a memorable innovator in form and a pungent character, he lacked the inner maturity, the breadth of reflection and the depth of discipline required for the highest level of architectural achievement. The drawings may beguile, but the flawed buildings reveal the truth.
James Stirling: Notes from the Archive is at Tate Britain, London SW1, from 5 April to 21 August. www.tate.org.uk
V&A unveils £35m plans for courtyard and underground gallery
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on March 28, 2011
Architect Amanda Levete's winning proposal for Victoria & Albert museum likely to fare better than controversial 'spiral' plan
Seven years after abandoning Daniel Libeskind's provocative Spiral extension plan, the V&A has announced a fresh proposal: a "new public space" for London above a huge underground gallery for temporary exhibitions.
Details of the £35m extension plan were announced after an architectural competition to develop what is currently office space on the Exhibition Road side of the V&A.
It follows the decision in 2004 to axe Libeskind's proposal – an eye-catching extension resembling an uneven stack of cardboard boxes. It divided opinion fiercely and when people hated it, they really hated it. Journalist William Rees-Mogg went so far as to call it a potential "disaster for civilisation".
Now the V&A is expanding underground, with British architect Amanda Levete winning the contest to build its extension. Levete said she had "dreamed of working on a major public and cultural project ever since I started as an architect, and it doesn't get much better than this".
The V&A is bullish about raising the money in such austere times and has been helped by an anonymous donation of nearly half the needed £35m. It hopes the extension can be completed by 2015.
The proposal would see visitors walking into an open public courtyard off a newly landscaped Exhibition Road through the screen erected by Sir Aston Webb in 1909 to hide the boilerhouse yard.
The screen would become a colonnade. People will enter what Levete described as "South Kensington's drawing room" with the ground having a carpet-like pattern. It will be a space that can be hired or curated with art or music or film as well as a place to simply sit on the steps or have a coffee. Visitors will also be able to glimpse the new 1,500 sq metre gallery space for temporary exhibitions that will be created below.
Levete was for 20 years co-partner with Jan Kaplicky of Future Systems, the firm behind the Selfridges store in Birmingham and the Lord's media centre. After Kaplicky's death two years ago, Levete set up her practice, ALA. The V&A commission is one of a number of projects she is working on. Others include a hotel in Bangkok, a subway station in Naples with artist Anish Kapoor, and a residential tower in Shoreditch, east London.
Levete said the V&A work had been "a very interesting and paradoxical project" because it involved making the invisible visible. "We're creating a vast gallery that is below ground, so how do you create that sense of there being something underground in a way that is subtle?" It is all very different to Libeskind's plan. Levete said of his Spiral: "It was a great building but for me it was in the wrong place and I think the moment for that iconography has passed – it is the moment to do something different."
Paul Ruddock, chair of the V&A's trustees, said the project was essential. "The V&A produces the very best international design exhibitions and the existing exhibition courts, arranged over three separate rooms, are no longer fit for purpose."
The extension is part of the V&A's second 10-year phase of restoration and redesign, called Future Plan.
Also planned is a new fashion gallery scheduled to open in May 2012, furniture galleries for November 2012 and a new textile and fashion centre at Blythe House, Olympia.
Outgoing V&A director Sir Mark Jones said the plan was about creating "stunning new spaces" and returning to the ideas and aspirations of the V&A's founders.
"We've recovered 3,000 sq metres of back-of-house space for galleries and public areas enabling us to show many more objects from the collections better than ever before."
Why pop-ups pop up everywhere
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on October 12, 2010
Temporary shops and restaurants were once a way for artists to subvert empty urban spaces. Now, they're just as likely to be part of a corporate marketing strategy
In a dark, dank nightclub beneath some railway arches, with the clatter and chug of trains overhead, I am having a minor Proustian moment. This London club was last open in the late 1990s, and its smell sends me straight back to that era, my student days: to Britpop and Blur, late-teenage clinches, 70p for a vodka and Coke. The aroma is strong, sour, specific, but it won't linger here for very much longer.
Over the last few weeks this long-abandoned club has been taken over by a group of young event organisers for an ambitious, 99-day pop-up project called Counter Culture. The programme will deliver photographers and DJs, comedians and poets, art exhibitions and parties, a different lineup each night, spiriting this sprawling, downtrodden building straight into the 21st century. One of the four organisers, 23-year-old Lee Denny, meets me at the door, apologises for his moustache ("I'm not trying to look cool, I promise") and shows me around the venue he first discovered when he came to an underground party here.
Denny has some experience of pop-ups: five years ago, he started his own small music festival, LeeFest, in his back garden, and he still runs it each summer, albeit from a larger venue. He leads me into the smaller of the club's two main rooms, kitted out with old, over-stuffed sofas and a much more expertly stuffed fox head. The artist responsible for the fox only works with roadkill, says Denny, and he's particularly excited about a live taxidermy workshop she's going to be running.
We move on through a small changing room, where a pair of grubby grey y-fronts hangs from a high ledge, and out to the main stage. On the opening night, in late September, the club filled up with 980 people, "and musicians kept arriving," says Denny, "people who remembered the place, and had heard about what we were doing. There was Jazzie B from Soul II Soul, and Suggs from Madness. He said 'Have you got a trombone?' and then he got up on stage and was like," he holds one hand to his mouth and slides a fist deliberately through the air, "rum-pa-pum-pum-pum."
Counter Culture is just one of thousands of pop-up events that have opened in the UK and beyond over the last few years – ranging from the small to the large, the cool to the rubbish, the sublime to the ridiculous. There have been pop-up shops, restaurants and gardens; pop-up galleries– one in an abandoned Woolworths in Leytonstone – and cinemas – Tilda Swinton even carted one around the Scottish Highlands. There have been pop-up gigs in launderettes; restaurants in front rooms; films projected in disused petrol stations or on to hay bales in fields.
Those are the more guerrilla projects, the grassroots events, often put together on a wing, a prayer and a stiflingly small bank loan. But alongside these are the corporate-backed pop-ups, the temporary shops and bars and restaurants that appear with increasing regularity, often hosted by well-known venues.
The Double Club in London in 2008, a part-Congolese, part-western restaurant and bar backed by fashion label Prada, was particularly successful. A branch of Central Perk, the coffee shop from the TV series Friends, which opened in London's Soho for a fortnight last year, was used to promote a limited-edition box set of the series. In 2006, Nike opened a shop in New York for four days, selling a special edition basketball shoe at $250 a pair. Gap has used a school bus, kitted out with merchandise instead of seats, as a travelling pop-up shop in the US.
There have been pop-up projects that have opened for an hour, like Mary Portas's vintage clothes sale in 2008, and others so successful that they've eventually become a permanent fixture, such as Tom Dixon's Dock Kitchen restaurant in Portobello Dock in west London. But what unites these disparate projects is essentially a strong fascination with the temporary, with the here-today-and-gone-tomorrow, the idea of excitement, urgency and a dynamic interaction with urban (and it is usually urban) spaces. These are projects that stand in opposition to clone towns, to the idea of uniformity and unending drabness.
The debut of pop-up businesses is often traced back to 2004, when Rei Kawakubo of the cutting-edge fashion brand, Comme des Garçons, set up a temporary shop in a disused building in Berlin. Realistically though, while the "pop-up" description might be fairly new, the idea is as old as the hills. The current craze has echoes in everything from the restaurants traditionally run in people's homes in Cuba to the shop that artists Sarah Lucas and Tracey Emin opened in London for six months in 1993, where they made and sold mugs and T-shirts and ashtrays.
The artist Dan Thompson set up his first pop-up gallery with friends in a bakery in Worthing in 2001; he now runs the Empty Shops Network, which advises artists who hope to start projects in one of the country's many disused high-street stores. (It's estimated that 13% of all UK shops are currently empty – and that one in five of those may never be used again.) He says that his inspiration comes from the magical curiosity shops that have appeared for centuries in fiction, "which no one can ever quite find again. I love creating something that's gone so quickly that people say afterwards: 'Was that you? Did that happen?' I love that excitement that you can create in a town, that sense of – what's coming next?"
While these businesses have counter-cultural roots, there's no doubt they've become a corporate concern. As Ali Madanipour, professor of urban design at Newcastle University says, there are two key readings of pop-ups, which aren't mutually exclusive. One is that they can be "a positive way of making more intensive use of urban space," he says, "bringing life to parts of the city that are under-used – they can provide space for local activity, civil-society events, impromptu gatherings. But on the other hand, they can also be an aid to consumerism, in which brands create a stage setting, adding colour and texture to the general mall atmosphere that is the backdrop to many of our urban spaces. Pop-up businesses support shopping – they bring a festival atmosphere to shopping."
The exclusivity of pop-up events means those that are ticketed often sell out extremely quickly. Denny says he now finds it "impossible to get excited about a new place that's opening indefinitely – you think, 'Oh yes, I'll go to that at some point' and you end up there in 20 years. Whereas if it's temporary it's like: 'We've got to do it right now.'"
When pop-ups are hosted by established businesses, this exclusivity and popularity can lead to obvious rewards for both host and brand. Over the last few weeks, the London restaurant Meza has been hosting a MasterChef pop-up, with former contestants from the TV show cooking for diners at a cost of £49 for three courses. When I went there last week, the atmosphere was loud, buzzy, excitable – obviously good for the restaurant, and good publicity for MasterChef. It apparently sold out in 72 hours.
One of the attractions of pop-ups for businesses is that they can act as an informal, unacknowledged market research project. Last week the smoothie maker Innocent ran a pop-up event in London called the Five for Five cafe – offering a two-course meal designed to deliver five portions of fruit and veg for £5. Dan Germain, head of creative at Innocent, said that the event, held in a disused tramshed, was "a no-brainer. Put on a bit of a party for the people who buy the drinks, meet and hang out with them, and find out stuff you wouldn't discover in some weird research group . . . You get all these charts and graphs that say your customer is a certain age, that they live in a certain place, do a certain thing, and then you see the real people. We could just loiter in Sainsbury's by the fridges and watch the people who come and buy our drinks, but we'd probably get kicked out."
Like the MasterChef event, the Innocent cafe sold out quickly, and was cleverly run – the cavernous space was dressed with fairy lights, fruit trees and herbs on every table; there was friendly service, and good food. Any pop-up event this well thought out, prompting this much goodwill, is clearly an excellent piece of marketing.
Germain says a pop-up event is better value for money than running an advertising campaign. "You're getting a more intense return," he says. "Fewer people, yes, but you're hopefully forging relationships that will last a lifetime." Their pop-up event also enabled them to communicate their brand in an incredibly strong, concentrated way. "Everything we want to do was under that roof," he says. Their core message was literally: "up on the back wall, written in big letters: Eat your greens."
Stephen Zatland, a partner at management consultancy Accenture, says that pop-up businesses give retailers other benefits which might not be immediately obvious to the consumer. It's a chance, he says, "to try out a new store location, to see if the kind of people they want to attract will start flocking there before they invest in a permanent site. Manufacturers can try out new products, new services, deliver them direct to the customer, promote a new brand, or try and re-invigorate an older brand".
And they can carry out all this research and promotion for a relatively low price. Zatland says that compared to opening a permanent site, pop-ups are fairly inexpensive. The recession, with its surfeit of empty shops, has played a key role in this trend. "When a lot of Woolworths stores became available, for instance, retailers picked up on those and rented them for a short period to try out something new on the high street."
The pop-up trend has been so big, for so long, that there have been whispers that it must be about to fizzle and die. But Zatland suggests this is unlikely. "There's another interesting trend for a more permanent kind of feature," he says, "where there's a site for maybe eight different pop-up stores, and the content of that site will rotate, change, every eight weeks, or every three weeks. That will be good, I think, because it encourages customers to keep coming back to see what the new feature is."
When I ask Thompson about the corporate fashion for pop-ups, about the way they're being used to flog us more unnecessary stuff, I expect him to be disdainful. But it's quite the opposite. "I love it," he says, "I love the fact that such a daft idea, started by artists, has taken over. I went to a pop-up Gucci put on, and it was fantastic. It's like Quentin Crisp said – don't keep up with the Joneses, drag them down to your level. We've completely subverted all these great brands, who are now having to think differently, more creatively, and that has to be good for our town centres."
There's no doubt that pop-ups can aid regeneration and make a genuine difference. As Thompson points out, "if you live somewhere the size of Worthing or Coventry or Carlisle or Margate, and you lose a few shops, you really notice it. If that's your home town, and you're passionate about it, you'll fight to make it better."
Horton Jupiter (whose real name, he jokes, is "Mystic Rock") is less positive about some aspects of the pop-up phenomenon. He has been running a cafe called The Secret Ingredient from his front room in Newington Green, London, for over a year now, and says he prefers the term "home restaurant", because pop-up has "become something that people use as a marketing tool". He appreciates the temporary, impromptu nature of pop-ups, but projects like his, he suggests, are meant to be precisely an escape from capitalism, from the robot on the end of the phone, towards something more illicit, subversive, personal and warm.
For landlords whose properties have been empty for a while, these events are a great way to promote their building, bring people flooding back in, and perhaps get some free maintenance and decorating work done too. Thompson says he's never "paid anything more than a peppercorn rent – we cover business rates, we cover insurance, and in every shop we've been to we've left it in a better condition than we found it. We'll give it a lick of paint, a clean and tidy. We took a shop in Shoreham-by-Sea, initially for six months, but now for another six, and a place that had been derelict for 10 years has been completely refurbished – which has led to two other derelict shops nearby coming back into use as well."
Where artists go, corporations follow. And so does gentrification, as areas blossom, flourish and improve - and rents subsequently head skywards. Perhaps now, at a time of deep economic anxiety and trouble, we should just enjoy the most exciting of the pop-ups, those that bring life to depressed corners, flowers to abandoned skips, the flicker of film to the hollow beneath an underpass.
There is something slightly sinister about the marketing guile – and rampant consumerism – behind some of these projects, but many are straightforwardly brilliant, and there seems no shortage of people happy to get involved. "Every time I walk past an empty shop or building," says Denny, "I think: I've got to do something in there, I just have to! If I had time, every empty space that was remotely intriguing would be filled."
William Morris | Visual art review
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on September 7, 2010
Blackwell, Bowness-on-Windermere
Without William Morris, there would be no Blackwell – built on the shores of Windermere by Mackay Hugh Baillie Scott in 1900 and regarded as one of the most harmonious examples of Arts and Crafts architecture in the country. It makes the ideal location for an exhibition examining Morris's love affair with the north, which he described as "the loveliest part of all England".
Morris was a frequent visitor to Cumbria, where he "sniffed the smell of the moors and felt in Iceland again". He was so enraptured with Iceland that he taught himself the language in order to translate the literature. The exhibition contains a monumental, hand-printed edition of the Volsung saga, which Morris believed to be as central to northern civilisation as the fall of Troy to ancient Greece.
Further evidence of Morris's hands-on enthusiasm comes in the pestle and mortar with which he ground his own pigments, having apprenticed himself to a dyer's workshop in order to "learn the practice of dying at every pore". A sketch of a condemned church in York bears witness to Morris's pioneering work as a conservationist (the church is still there).
Amid all the examples of Morris's profuse range of interests, the flora and fauna of his ubiquitous textile designs seems almost incidental. But even Morris realised that his attempt to transform middle- class interiors into a medieval vision of Eden was a chimera: "a vision of England as it never was and never will be". Blackwell, with its murals, banqueting hall and minstrels' gallery, is perhaps the fullest realisation of Morris's idea of an England that never was.
The Surreal House at the Barbican
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 16, 2010
This new show is 'a mysterious dwelling infused with subjectivity and desire' featuring artists such as Salvador Dalí, Marcel Duchamp, Alberto Giacometti and René Magritte
Best of the London Festival of Architecture
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 16, 2010
From sugary sculptures to a madcap midnight cycling tour, Jonathan Glancey rounds up 10 festival treats that promise a fresh perspective on the capital
The fourth biennial London Festival of Architecture is an enormous affair, boasting some 300 events in the West End, East End and south London between 20 June and 20 July 2010. These range from the arcane and baffling to walks and cycle rides aimed at opening up fresh perspectives of the miasmic city. I've chosen seven of the best tours (there's no better way of getting to grips with London's architecture than getting on your bike or stepping out), as well as three fixed events as different from one another as St Mary Abchurch is from 30 St Mary Axe.
Dogs for Architecture!
When I turned up to work for the first time in Canary Wharf Tower some 15 years ago, I was refused entry. A pair of jaw-jutting blokes in faux-American security outfits pointed at William, my veteran London mongrel, and said he couldn't come in. Guide dogs only, they said. This dog guides me through London (as through life), I said, hopefully. The guards only looked more aggressive. Odd, I can't help thinking, that so much modern architecture is anti-dog. My favourite City church, St Mary Abchurch, once housed a kennel-like pew especially for four-legged visitors. Luckily, dogs are still welcome in many parts of town, as well as in proper churches, pubs, cafes and offices; so it's good to see a walking tour of architecture in and around Bloomsbury aimed at dogs and their guardians. Even if your bulldog takes against the 60s brutalism of much of the University of London, or your boxer barks disapprovingly at the rebuilt Brunswick Centre, there are graceful Georgian terraces to trot past, Charles Holden's coolly enigmatic Senate House to pad through (well, the lobby anyway) and, best of all, a chance to sniff around Russell Square Gardens as well as Bedford and Bloomsbury Squares while taking in their enthralling skylines.
• Sunday 20 June, 10:30-1:00pm. Only dogs owners and well-behaved dogs need apply. £9.50/£7.50 concession. Please email tours@open-city.org.uk or telephone 0207 383 2131, Mon-Fri 9.30am-6pm (advance booking is essential).
Pimp Your Pavement!
This promises to be an eye-opening event, especially for those with green fingers. Richard Reynolds, author of On Guerrilla Gardening, will lead a 90-minute walking tour of the "guerrilla gardens" of deepest London, SE1 – not tobacco plantations founded by former Cuban revolutionaries, but pavements and urban nooks and crannies where local people have begun to plant and cultivate every spare bit of land. London's streets are in need of trees; but beans, tomatoes, marrows and potatoes (with their beautiful flowers) would make many of them more attractive, too. Central London might have lost all too many of its food markets; now, says Reynolds, it's time to take "guerrilla" action and grow our own. Reynolds would like to show you how.
• Sunday 20 June. For further details, see the Pimp Your Pavement website.
Midsummer Madness
From "Greenwich to Primrose Hill to Bankside via the deserted sleeping city and the Nash boulevards" – and starting at 2am ... This solstice bike ride, organised by Southwark Cyclists, might seem for insomniacs only, and yet this is a fine time to see central London and its architecture. The one and only time, in fact; the streets are almost quiet, and cyclists can look up at their surroundings rather than down and from side to side for raw survival's sake. There is a coffee stop at 3am at Bar Italia, Soho, still almost the only place you can buy a proper cappuccino in London, and which looks pretty much as it did when it opened in 1949. Breakfast is at the Leon bar and café, Canvey Street, immediately behind Tate Modern, which is opening at 6am, specially for cyclists on this ride.
• Monday 21 June. See the London Festival of Architecture (LFA) website for further details.
Building Skywards: Aldgate and City of London Towers
Afternoon and evening walks on three days (23, 24 and 25 June) setting off from Aldgate underground station and taking in the soaring new towers of the City. Actually, the very first of these buildings was Aldgate itself, originally a Roman gateway leading into Londinium from the busy road to Camulodunum (Colchester). Until remarkably recently, the towers and spires of the churches (rebuilt for the most part by Christopher Wren) were the City's "skyscrapers"; today these modest, if sometimes exquisite, buildings seem like toys compared with the enormous towers shooting up in honour of mammon. Sadly, for reasons of business and security, it's not possible to reach the top of the latest towers by Foster, Rogers, Grimshaw, Kohn Pedersen Fox and co, although you could end this tour with a drink in the Vertigo bar at the top of Tower 42, formerly the NatWest Tower, a 70s structural tour-de-force designed by Colonel Richard Seifert and his regiment of commercially astute architects.
• 23, 24 and 25 June. Book through the LFA website.
Birds of Bankside
From earliest childhood until a decade or so ago, one of the things I liked doing best in central London was feeding the sparrows from the bridge spanning the lake in St James's Park. Try this today, though, and you might wait all year. There are several theories as to where all the cockney sparrows have gone (their Parisian cousins appear to thrive); one of mine is that our new, or made-over, buildings are hermetic, defensive things with no nooks and crannies for sparrows to nest. You will be given a more informed answer from Peter Holden, who is leading this early morning walk around Bankside in search of birds and other London wildlife. The tour will also be taking in some new architect-designed nests by 51% Studio on behalf of the Architecture Foundation close to Tate Modern. Holden has worked for the RSPB for 30 years and is author of the authoritative and delightful RSPB Handbook of British Birds.
• Thursday 24 June. Book through the LFA website.
The Green Room
Architects in London, or those hoping to find work in London, have faced very hard times indeed over the past year or so. Few practices have got away without making staff redundant. Chetwood Architects is making a fully serviced room available to architects at its office at 12-13 Clerkenwell Green, opposite the Marx Memorial Library (where Lenin published Iskra) and the Crown Tavern (where the revolutionary was joined for a beer by a young Stalin in 1903). Up to six architects at a time will be able to use the Green Room for a week "to showcase their work, arrange/prepare for meetings and interviews in a relaxed coffee-house-style environment". Employment exchanges have never been quite so alluring. A "prominent display space in Chetwood's front window will showcase selected drawings and designs", says the practice, and given that London is always on the look-out for fresh talent, seats in the Green Room will doubtless be in great demand.
• From Thursday 24 June until a year afterwards. If you believe you have a legitimate reason to use the Green Room, contact Geoff Cunningham.
The Best of France in London with Stephen Bayley
Stephen Bayley – author, critic, curator, bon viveur – leads a bicycle ride through French-influenced London. The tour starts at Michelin House, Fulham Road, the curiously delightful and beautifully restored former headquarters of the Michelin Tyre Company designed by the engineer François Espinasse in a flouncy art nouveau style that belies its radical ferro-concrete structure. From here, Bayley (astride his single-speed, Korean-made, North American Cannondale Capo bicycle) will lead his designer team to Westminster Abbey "to see the influence of Reims, Amiens and Chartres", to the Wallace Collection and its French art and furniture, to Ernö Goldfinger's "homage to Le Corbusier" in Piccadilly (French Tourist Office, 1956), Jean Cocteau's murals in Notre Dame de France in Leicester Place, the French Church in Soho Square and One New Change, a massive new office block by Jean Nouvel in the shadow of the dome of the very English St Paul's Cathedral. Those who survive Bayley's banter and the worst of London traffic will be rewarded with champagne.
• Saturday 26 June. Book through the LFA website.
Restless Cities Walking Tour
LFA invites the adventurous on this "saccadic stroll" led by Esther Leslie, professor of political aesthetics at London's Birkbeck College. Saccadic has something to do with seeing things in a fast-cut way – you're welcome to look it up too – and I think the idea, rooted in Restless Cities, a book of essays published earlier this year by Verso, is that city life is so full of fleeting images, occurrences and ideas that it can be unnerving to walk the streets – or, of course, it can be a wonderfully mind-blowing experience. Anyone who offers you a fresh way of looking at London has to be worth 90 minutes, and I'm sure Leslie will have dreamed up ways of stirring the imaginations of anyone willing to walk on the quasi-philosophical side.
• Sunday 27 June. The LFA website offers no details, but the walk starts at 3pm in front of the Whitechapel Art Gallery.
Sugar Cube, Tate Modern
Brendan Jamison has sculpted a copy of Tate Modern in sugar cubes. This sort of thing (such as ships in bottles in Trafalgar Square, or the Forth Bridge reproduced 1:1 scale in matchsticks) is always fun. Built on a scale of 1:100 (the chimney is 3.3ft high), Tate Sweet comprises no fewer than 71,908 cubes – or 52bn individual sugar crystals – that have taken three months to assemble. Other sources tell me that these figures should be revised upwards to more than 80,000 cubes and 60m crystals. Whatever the truth, there is enough sugar here for all the tea served in London in about an hour. I think. If you would like to see how he made this extraordinary architectural confection, Jamison will be running family workshops alongside the model on Saturday 3 July (NEO Bankside pavilion, Hopton Street, opposite the Turbine Hall entrance to Tate Modern). To register for a place, contact neobankside@camronpr.com or call Hannah, Ross or Lizzie at Camron PR on 0207 420 1700. If you attend one of these, you might just want to ask Jamison why on earth he did such a thing in the first place.
1:1 – Architects Build Small Spaces
The V&A's contribution to LFA is this hugely enjoyable exhibition featuring seven imaginative new buildings, each one specially commissioned for the seven miles of corridors within this glorious South Kensington museum. From a fairytale Japanese teahouse on stilts to a pavilion made of geometric acrylic panels in the guise of a computer-imagined tree, here are miniature buildings designed to provoke and delight the imagination.
• At the V&A Museum, London, until 30 August.
1:1 – Architects Build Small Spaces at the V&A
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 14, 2010
Gallery: The V&A museum in London invited 19 architects to submit proposals for small structures to be built full-scale inside its walls
From the archive, 10 June 1958: Brasilia in model form
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on June 10, 2010
Originally published in the Manchester Guardian on 10 June 1958
From tomorrow an exhibition showing the projected new capital city of Brazil will be at the Institute of Contemporary Art, Dover Street, London. Brasilia, which is to become the seat of government in 1960, at present consists of vast site works and two nearly finished buildings, the "Residency" and a hotel.
Since this city, six hundred miles from the coast, will normally be approached by air, it is one of the few projects of which a model can give a realistic view. First of all a map locates the city and offers data of latitude, longitude, temperature, altitude and the object of the whole operation. The far end of the gallery is filled by a progress photograph of Oscar Niemeyer's Residency building, showing the marble clad pilotis (columns) with the silhouettes of steep waves, locally known as "Oscar's Cardiograph". Niemeyer was commissioned by the President to put up the buildings pending the result of the preliminary competition for a broad planning idea.
Brasilia was first thought of seriously in 1823 and received legislative reality in 1946. In 1956 the development corporation was formed and President Kubitchek invited Niemeyer to prepare sketch plans for the city. On the architect's advice, however, operations were held up while the competition was held and judged by an internationally constituted jury. Lucio Costa's broad scheme was adopted.
Costa's idea for the city is a plan shaped like a bent bow and arrow. The bow, the residential area. The arrow, the legislative buildings. Whether a capital city for half a million inhabitants can spring fully armed from the designer's brain has yet to be seen.
First reminding oneself that the concrete will be seen against deep blue sky and red earth, one can consider the Residency, with its spiral concrete chapel, and the saucer and the dome of the Plenary Assembly Hall, whose silhouette dominates the roof of the congress building. One can question the wisdom of using the same pilotis shape as at the Residency for the Supreme Court and Government buildings, but here at right angles to curtain walls, or the political implications of siting Congress and Senate under one roof.
Study of the housing section reveals that the community unit is 3,000, each with its own primary school, market and church. Overlooking from flat to flat has been strictly avoided and services have been considered carefully even at this outline stage. Each community is screened by a grove of trees. Architecturally one of the most interesting experiments is the use of immense horizontal platforms to produce monumentality.
The V&A goes underground with shortlisted designs for new gallery
Posted by The Sheet in Architecture News on March 3, 2011
The V&A has unveiled seven rival designs for an underground gallery. Let's hope we end up with a stirring art space
• In pictures: the seven V&A designs
Some 15 years ago, the Victoria & Albert Museum planned a new extension that would twist up and out of the ground in a challenging sequence of irregular zigs and zags. This was the Spiral, designed by Daniel Libeskind, architect of the famous deconstructivist Jewish Museum in Berlin, and the mathematician and engineer, Cecil Balmond. Although ingenious, the Spiral was unable to attract the funding required to build it, perhaps £80m at the time. It was also contentious, to say the least, in design terms – enough to cause apoplexy among local residents in plutocratically genteel South Kensington. The project was abandoned in 2004.
Now, the V&A has unveiled seven rival designs for a new gallery, in place of Libeskind's, that spirals underground. This clever reversal of form means that an exciting, even controversial design can exist without dominating the skyline: a very English compromise for a very English space, this grand duchess of a museum that appears forbidding from the outside, but is all decorous charm within.
All seven designs exhibit a lively intelligence. There is the cloistered calm of Tony Fretton's design and the magic carpet effect of Amanda Levete's. Fretton imagines a placid, contemporary medieval courtyard before stairs and escalators on one side of the cloister transport visitors to the exhibition spaces below. Levete's design is more animated than Fretton's, a magic grotto with cascading levels and stairs. Both approaches have their attractions.
Snohetta, the Norwegian studio best known for the stirring new Alexandrian Library in Egypt and the iceberg-like opera house in Oslo, shows how an underground building can have real, attractive presence on the surface. In collaboration with British architect Gareth Hoskins, Snohetta proposes a terrace of great steps stacked behind the existing Victorian stone screen on Exhibition Road (the facade to the courtyard that will house the new gallery). This shows an intelligent architectural balance, between urban theatre and practical planning, that mirrors the V&A itself.
The trick here is to make a compelling entrance that will draw visitors in even if the main building is largely out of sight. The architect chosen for the project has the challenging task of making great presence out of what is, in effect, absence: a hole in the ground. The London Underground, and the Moscow Metro, did this years ago, demonstrating how architecture below the pavement can be among the most elegant and stirring of all.
The new gallery will be used for temporary exhibitions and the winner will be announced at the end of this month. I wonder if one aspect of the Spiral might be revived? The original Libeskind building was due to house new and unexpected shows; its disconcerting architecture was intended to reflect its standing as a powerhouse of the imagination, devoted to new ways of seeing the world through the things we can dream up and make.
Let's hope the new gallery, although largely out of sight, isn't too polite in purpose. The V&A was once called the "nation's handbag": it is a treasury of special things intended to inspire the very best in new design. We'll be watching closely when we get the chance to go underground at the V&A in a few years' time.
• The designs are on display in the V&A Sackler Centre until 3 April
Architecture, Art and design, Comment, Culture, Exhibitions, guardian.co.uk, Museums, V&A
No Comments