Archive for February, 2009

Serpentine turns to Japanese architects for 2009 pavilion

In a Guardian exclusive, Jonathan Glancey reveals that Sanaa, the Tokyo practice responsible for New York's New Museum of Contemporary Art, will design this summer's Serpentine pavilion

The most inspiring, and beautiful, of the Serpentine Gallery summer pavilions to date was designed by the Japanese architect, Toyo Ito, with Cecil Balmond, the Sri Lankan-born structural engineer. Seven years on, the Serpentine has gone to Japan again to find its architects. This time around it's the turn of Sanaa, a Tokyo practice founded by Kazuyo Sejima (48) and Ryue Nishizawa (38) in 1995.

Like Ito, Sanaa's work is ethereal, exquisite, translucent and testing. Very quietly, very gently, Sejima and Nishizawa, have pushed the boundaries of contemporary architecture. It might be a little corny to say they have done so in a Zen-like fashion, and yet their buildings, interiors, installations, furniture and other designs have been remarkably calm and quieting, objects for contemplation as well as buildings and designs with a practical purpose.

Quite what Sanaa will do for the Serpentine and Kensington Gardens remains to be seen, but if their best known building to date, The New Museum of Contemporary Art, New York, completed four years ago, is anything to go by, it will be sculptural, peaceful and gently haunting. Haunting, that is, not in the sense of disturbing, but in a way that will very probably remain in visitors' memories long after it's be disassembled, sold and re-erected somewhere else in the world as several of the Serpentine pavilions have been over the past decade.

The New Museum of Contemporary Art is one of the most striking buildings on Manhattan's boisterous skyline. It rises like some shimmering stack of half-open, half-closed drawers among the city's spires, and yet, although an undeniably strong composition, it's as gentle as a spring breeze. To make large-scale structures so seemingly weightless, as if consisting more of air and light than steel and glass, takes both imagination and a truly refined skill.

As for smaller buildings, including a number of fine houses in Japan, Sanaa has the knack of shaping structures that really do resemble – in the very best sense – fine card or paper models. These can seem improbably delicate, and even when chastely minimal, very beautiful indeed. Both architects are self-effacing, modest and highly talented. To be asked to design their first building in Britain at a time of recession may seem something of a thankless task, yet there are many of us hoping that when the economic going gets good again, the next generation of architecture will be more like Sanaa's than Shanghai's, Dubai's or Stratford's – east London, that is. Even if it isn't, Sanaa and the Serpentine Gallery are very likely to shape a special place in Kensington Gardens that, like Ito's pavilion, we will dream about happily even when it's long vanished into the architectural ether.

We will, of course, show you the design for the 2009 Serpentine summer pavilion as soon as we are able to.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

, , , , ,

No Comments

Helsinki Zoo’s redevelopment by Beckmann-N’Thépé Agency

French architect Beckmann-N’Thépé Agency has unveiled images of its proposed redevelopment of Finland’s largest zoo on Korkeasaari island near Helsinki.

No Comments

Architecture: Stephen Bayley discerns the shape of things to come

Darmstadt and Dubai present the extreme possibilities of contemporary living. In the first, a small town south of Frankfurt, you find the Passivhaus Institut. Since 1996, it has been experimenting with the ultimate in environmentally intelligent building design.

Dubai has been doing the opposite: athletically raising the bar in competition for irresponsible, expensive and brainless architectural kitsch. So in Darmstadt you can find the ur-Passivhaus, while Dubai is offering a revolving building so your infinity pool on the 80th storey can follow the sun.

In Darmstadt, the question is: can we make our existing homes ecologically intelligent? Probably not. Most houses are thermal atrocities which waste and leak energy at every stage of their construction, existence and demolition. Short of layering up in ski-suits, switching off the power and using candles, the best option is to start again.

Thus, the commonsensical Passive House and its simple rules. Face south (if in Europe) to take full advantage of (free) solar energy. If at all possible, be partially buried: the ground is an efficient, and again entirely free, thermal moderator which helps keep temperatures stable. Use triple glazing and standards of insulation and sealing inspired by the disciplines of aerospace. Capture rainwater and recycle most of what is used. Integrate heating and ventilation into a single, very small, very efficient, very German electro-mechanical unit.

So the Passive House is completely airtight. And with no temperature drops, body heat is usefully retained. In this thermal utopia, the only artificial heating is carried by the minimalist ventilation. The UK's first Passive House, designed by Bere Architects, is now being built in Camden, North London. It will, perhaps, be a little bit like living on the Northern Line: what fresh air there may be is pre-heated through subterranean channels. Other problems? Ecological perfection will demand a quality of detailing hitherto unknown to our native builders. And there will be no flinging open the windows to greet the new green dawn. That way you squander your patiently retained heat.

In Dubai, the question is: how can we offer a market sated by excess a novelty to stimulate jaded palates? Dubai's natural hot-house atmosphere has already had an astonishing forcing effect on architectural imaginations, not all of it positive. Delirious money has driven stand-up comedy buildings high into the desert sky, creating a horizon of baffling vulgarity. But nothing yet built is so challenging as the revolving building proposed by the Dynamic Group.

This tower is designed to turn in circles, so offering not just commodity, firmness and delight, but rpm too. Each prefabricated floor will be attached to a central service shaft, supported by a bearing whose design and specification will surely be technically demanding. Concentric with the shaft and layered between apartments are giant horizontal wind-driven fans. If I understand correctly, these power motors which turn each residential floor separately on its axis. Will residents have a gearbox to moderate the revolutionary speed of their apartment?

While Darmstadt's Passive Houses look remarkably similar to a local bourgeois urban vernacular established in the early 19th century, artistically the Dubai revolver is part of the current fad for "torqued towers", buildings with an irrational expressive strain designed into them. Santiago Calatrava's Malmo, Zaha Hadid's Dancing Towers and Rem Koolhaas's Central Chinese TV HQ are examples. But all these architecture-sculptures are static. The Dynamic Group upstages them with a building that actually moves. The philosophical complexities and absurdities of modern life can have no more powerful symbol.

There may be objections. Those big fans: how much noise and vibration will they cause? If sitting in a Passive House is like sitting on the Northern Line, the revolving tower may be like sitting in a food processor. And since Dubai's wind patterns are dominated by daytime sea-breezes, won't all the floors end up facing the same way? Then there is the prosaic matter of plumbing. Those vital flexible joints require an untried technology! Might centrifugally expressed kitchen or bathroom slops ruin the shock of the view? In both Darmstadt and Dubai, it all comes down to hot air and waste water, as does so much of life.

Architecture, they used to say, is frozen music. In Darmstadt and Dubai, the extreme possibilities seem to be a solemn fugue or a drunken samba. Maybe the real future will have a different soundtrack.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

Japan’s Sanaa to design this year’s Serpentine Pavilion

First English project for practice founders Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa

No Comments

Boris Johnson criticised by Evening Standard over tall buildings

An Evening Standard leader:

Boris Johnson's policy of restricting approval for tall buildings in London to limited areas was once a fundamental element of his approach to planning. But his approval for tall buildings in Wandsworth and Ealing, areas without existing clusters of blocks, suggests an approach more like the ad-hoc policy of his predecessor, Ken Livingstone, who took a notoriously lax attitude to skyscrapers. Now Mr Johnson has a chance to show whether his planning policy for our skyline has rigour or consistency.

A new proposal for The Spires, three enormous tower blocks right by City Hall, is being submitted for approval. It would be hard to justify. The tallest of the three would reportedly offer views of the English Channel; together they would interfere with the Mayor's own views. In a downturn, there is little economic rationale for projects like this; aesthetically, there is even less. Mr Johnson should say no.

Wow, Veronica really has left the building hasn't she? No wonder Boris is putting on a Russian festival, of which he says:

Russian Londoners are a thriving community who have made a significant contribution to the capital both economically and culturally. I encourage everyone to come and enjoy this fantastic festival offering.

Are you listening, Alexander?

More on The Spires and other Irvine Sellar proposals for central London here.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

, , , , ,

No Comments

Peace centre with a panic room

Can architecture end a war? Steve Rose travels to Israel to see Peace House, a new building with big ambitions - and a bomb shelter on every floor

With all the ironies crushing down on it, it's amazing this building is still standing. Opening shortly after a devastating conflict, the Peres Peace House is a venue for propagating peace and improving ties between Israel and its neighbours. Furthermore, this smart new piece of architecture is named after Shimon Peres, elder statesman of Israeli politics, Nobel peace prize laureate and founder of the Peres Centre for Peace, a successful non-governmental organisation. He is also the country's president, which complicates matters. While the Peres Centre arranges for the treatment of injured Gaza children in Israeli hospitals, Peres publicly defends the military attacks that put them there.

But the Peace House could yet live up to its name. When it opens next month, the building will serve as the Peres Centre's new HQ. Its ethos is that peace in the region will be made between people, not governments, and its activities range from organising football matches between mixed Israeli and Palestinian youth teams to establishing a cross-border chamber of commerce. The new building enables the Peres Centre to host conferences, talks and arts events. It will also house Shimon Peres's personal library and archives, for the benefit of researchers and students. A one-stop peace shop, if you like. But as well as helping to achieve peace, this building had to somehow represent it - to make solid an abstract quality.

Landed with this tall but prestigious order was Italian architect Massimiliano Fuksas. Though little known in Britain, Fuksas is one of Europe's most renowned architects - an expressive innovator who would rather design with a paintbrush than a computer. His work varies wildly in style but is marked by a sculptural flair that gives rise to grand gestures and memorable forms. His recent Zenith music hall in Strasbourg, for example, is a wonky drum covered in an orange membrane that lights up at night like a lantern; his huge Milan Exhibition Centre, meanwhile, is draped in a swirling roof of steel and glass.

The Peace House is another of Fuksas's poetic one-offs, although it shows an appropriate degree of restraint. It is situated on the seafront in the ancient port town of Jaffa, just south of Tel Aviv, an area populated, peacefully, by both Israeli Arabs and Jews. In essence, it is simply a long box emerging out of the hillside. The short end, facing the sea, is a wall of clear glass; the other three sides are made up of thin horizontal bands of copper-green concrete and glass of various thicknesses, layered apparently randomly, like sedimentary rock. These strata, says Fuksas, allude to "time and patience, the stratification of the history of two peoples". The building materials, too, represent "places that have suffered heavily": solid concrete for times of stability, fragile glass for conflict and turmoil. The only clear view is out to the sea - to the future. "It is the representation of an emergency," says Fuksas of the building.

It all sounds rather literal but in reality it works marvellously. On the outside, the Peace House immediately stands out as something different - monumental yet light. To enter, you walk down from the road at the top, through a landscaped park alongside the building and round to the glass front doors facing the sea. While the walls are smooth and flat on the outside, on the inside the concrete strata project out, giving the sides an undulating, almost natural texture. Light entering between these concrete slabs illuminates the space magically, even mystically. At certain times, the low sun shines into the building, casting curious shadows, but generally it is filled with a soft, diffused glow that changes with the time of day. It feels, well, peaceful.

"I always try to do something I have never done before - that is my way," says Fuksas. "When you do a project, the first thing it has to be is useful for its tenants, but much more importantly, it has to have alchemy - like this magical light where you cannot see its origin. Because with this alchemy you have emotion. A building without emotion is not architecture."

The most dramatic space is Peres's library, at the back of the building, on the ground floor. You're basically standing underground here, since the building is half-submerged in the hillside, but an atrium rises up the back wall to skylights in the ceiling. There's a clear metaphor here - reaching upwards from the depths - but the space is powerful enough on its own terms. The other show-stopping area, and the climax of the public route through the building, is a wood-panelled auditorium on the first floor. Rather than the usual black box, its back wall is a giant window facing the Mediterranean. "If you don't want to listen to the people speaking, you can just watch the sea," says Fuksas.

The Peace House feels a bit like an inhabited monument - a beautiful art installation that unfortunately had to be divided into rooms. The interior tries its best not to disrupt the overall effect, though. In places, the upper floors don't quite touch the walls, with glass filling in the gaps. The internal divisions are also glass, where possible, although there is a concrete core running through the building containing stairs and services, plus a uniquely Israeli architectural feature: a reinforced "panic room" on each floor, a shelter in case of bomb or gas attack. Every new building in Israel is required to have them.

Building the Peace House hasn't been easy, Fuksas says. The project began more than 10 years ago - at a time when peace in the region did not seem such a distant prospect. Then, it was a joint initiative between Peres and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, to be situated in Tulkarem, close to the West Bank-Israeli border. After Arafat's death, it proceeded in its current form, but there were myriad problems with acquiring the site and the funding (from private donors - Peres is nothing if not well-connected). Fuksas's grand vision was not easy to translate into reality either. It was imagined that the horizontal concrete elements would be made offsite then simply stacked on to columns, like a giant child's game. But this proved to be logistically impossible. So a local architect had to work out an alternative, whereby the walls were patiently built up one layer at a time. On the metaphorical level, that's somehow appropriate.

There's still an uneasy split running through this project, though. As well as that crushing irony (Peres strives to be the big peacemaker while defending Israeli military action), the Peace House wants to be both a US-style presidential memorial library and a grassroots NGO headquarters, part gift to humanity, part vanity project. "Sometimes, this fact is awkward," acknowledges Ron Pundak, the Peres Centre's director. "But basically we are putting a very clear distance between his activity as president and our activities as the Peres Centre for Peace."

Pundak also admits to some discomfort about the prospect of receiving, say, a Palestinian partner from a refugee camp in his shiny new HQ. At present, the Peres Centre operates out of a nondescript office block in Tel Aviv, which is probably better suited to its activities. "I won't find myself very comfortable there," says Pundak of the Peace House. "But it does not reflect the Peres Centre for Peace - it reflects the vision and life and future of Mr Peres. This is the innovative approach of Mr Peres. He's not a normal politician."

Nor, it bears remembering, is Israel a normal place in which to build. Architecture has almost become an instrument of warfare in this region. There is the notorious West Bank barrier, for example, which Israel has unilaterally built (and continues to build) around Palestinian areas. Israel says the barrier has improved security against cross-border terrorist attacks; Palestinians say it severs and imprisons communities, and amounts to a land grab. Architecture has also been used as a weapon in territorial disputes. Best known are the Israeli settlements that have been built across the West Bank over the last 40 years. Israelis counter that Arabs have also built up areas, particularly around Jerusalem, in order to reinforce future territorial claims, even though many of the buildings stand empty.

Above all, of course, there is the destruction of buildings and infrastructure in Gaza, and the sisyphean task of rebuilding them. In this context, the Peace House is a much-needed contrast. Whether or not it cultivates peace, it at least sends an alternative message. Fuksas is the first to acknowledge that such expressions can easily be dismissed as hopelessly idealistic - but, he adds, that doesn't mean we shouldn't be making them. "We must never stop thinking peace is possible," he says.

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

, , , , , ,

No Comments

Toyo Ito leads donations to Australia bushfire recovery

Japanese star architect Toyo Ito has boosted fundraising efforts to help victims of the bushfires in Victoria, south Australia, which have left more than 180 dead and 7,000 homeless.

No Comments

Gehry’s Vegas brain building nears completion

While other starchitects’ projects falter in the global recession, it’s reassuring to see progress being made on Frank Gehry’s Lou Ruvo Brain Institute in Las Vegas.

No Comments

Victorian concrete house to be restored

The derelict Victorian house next to a busy junction in south London, shored up by scaffolding and garlanded in ivy, does not at first glance seem exceptional. But the structure, now saved after years of neglect, could perhaps be seen as the great-great-grandfather of all the tower blocks that fill Britain's cities.

Built in 1873, the house's walls are not made of the traditional brick, but pre-cast concrete. It is one of a tiny number of survivors from a brief period when a handful of Victorian builders became convinced that concrete was the future of housing. It is also believed to be the only remaining property built by Charles Drake, the era's most prolific and enthusiastic proponent of concrete homes.

As London's Barbican centre begins a major exhibition about Le Corbusier, the house serves as a vivid reminder that, decades before modernists took concrete into the architectural mainstream – it is now the world's most common building material – a small band of pioneers were extolling its virtues.

Yet despite acquiring a Grade II listing in 1994, the crumbling house, which is in the suburb of Forest Hill, has lain neglected for around 20 years. Southwark council has declined a series of applications by the owner to turn the site into flats and is to take out a compulsory purchase order, after which the house will be fully restored. "It's a very significant building, and it's important that we preserve it," said Kim Humphreys, in charge of housing for Southwark. "These legal processes, unfortunately, take a considerable length of time, and that's the reason that the building has got to the state it has."

This tale of survival against the odds shows that while Drake might have failed to persuade fellow housebuilders, there was little wrong with his construction methods, according to Lawrence Hurst, head of the history study group at the Institution of Structural Engineers, and an expert on early concrete buildings. "The fact this house is still standing, despite being neglected for so long, is a testament to the way it was built," he said.

"Concrete homes were pretty uncommon at the time. It was a relatively new material and quite expensive, and was still used mainly for civil engineering projects like drainage. There were not many homes built with it and very few survive."

Drake, a contractor rather than an architect, began as a manager for another pioneer of concrete, Joseph Tall, before branching out with his own Patent Concrete Building Company. Documents from the era show how Drake soon became an evangelist for the new methods. He took part in a series of talks at the Royal Institute of British Architects around the time he built the Forest Hill house, arguing that concrete homes were around a third cheaper to build than their brick equivalents, as well as being stronger and fire proof. At one discussion, in April 1876, Drake boasted: "During nearly 10 years past I have been exclusively occupied with it, and I believe I can claim, without exaggeration, to have erected more concrete buildings than any other person."

The transcript, however, also shows Drake fielding a series of questions about reports of cracks and shrinkage in concrete walls, and gives a sense of a man unable to persuade others about the material. He talks of his "disappointment ... to find amongst architects considerable reluctance to have anything to do with concrete buildings, and, with very few exceptions, little or no desire to know anything of it."

Drake never did see his ideas achieve mass acceptance, Hurst notes: "He clearly hoped this was an idea that would catch on. But it was really a cul de sac, in a lot of ways."

A brief history of concrete

Concrete, according to one book detailing its history, is rarely seen as a proper subject for study, "yet in the last 100 years it has probably had a greater impact on our surroundings, and indirectly on our way of life, than any other material".

The Romans were the first major pioneers, constructing concrete marvels like the dome of the Pantheon in Rome, which remained unmatched for centuries.

While forms of lime concrete were used in the early 19th century, mainly in foundations, it was only after 1824 when the Leeds inventor Joseph Aspdin patented Portland cement, the basis of modern concrete, that its use became widespread. At first mainly applied in civil engineering, one of concrete's first domestic uses came in 1852 when the French pioneer, François Coignet, built a four-storey concrete house in St Denis, Paris. "The reign of stone in building construction seems to have come to an end," he wrote, somewhat hopefully, three years later.

Another Frenchman, Joseph Monier, devised concrete reinforced with iron bars in 1867, initially in flower pots, although it was soon used for bridges. In 1903, the 16-storey Ingalls Building in Cincinnati became the first concrete high-rise.

Within a few decades, modernists like Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier embraced the material, the latter's taste for leaving concrete in its raw, unfinished state (known as béton brut) becoming highly influential. By the 1950s this passion for brutalism had reached the UK, making its presence felt in countless tower blocks as well as signature buildings such as Denys Lasdun's National Theatre (1967–76) and Chamberlin, Powell and Bon's Barbican Estate (1971–82).

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

, , , , ,

No Comments

Jonathan Glancey: East End needs an Olympian engineering revival

A better Olympic legacy for east London would be a return to its great manufacturing tradition

At York station yesterday, the Prince of Wales unveiled the nameplate of Tornado, the first mainline railway locomotive to be built in Britain for many years. Tornado just happens to be a steam engine, a slightly modernised recreation of a London and North Eastern Railway express passenger "Pacific" of 60 years ago.

Created over 18 years and at a cost of £3m by the A1 Locomotive Trust in Darlington, Tornado has captured the hearts of railway enthusiasts worldwide. Network Rail was astonished by the sheer scale and enthusiasm of the camera-toting crowds who turned up - all ages, classes, colours, genders and creeds - to witness the muscular apple green locomotive's first arrival at King's Cross. News of Tornado's exploits has been reported around the world, including China, where most heavy industry seems to be rooted today.

When Prince Charles officially named Tornado, it was against the backdrop of the sweeping curve of York's 1870s train shed, an adventure in cast-iron Victorian gothic designed by Thomas Prosser and William Peachey, and a properly Olympian setting for an Olympian locomotive. Within sight of those on the platform was York Minster, a commanding example of English craft, architecture and resolve. Overhead, a flight of RAF Tornado jets roared past. For a few precious minutes, York harboured a stirring gathering of British design and engineering excellence, a legacy to savour.

Turn now to the scene enacted a fortnight ago at Stratford, east London, where the mayor of London, the secretary of state for communities and the Olympics minister unveiled "legacy plans" for the 2012 Olympics. Now that prized private funding has vanished, the legacy will be paid for by the public purse. It had better be good. As good as York Minster, York station, a fly past of the RAF's finest and Tornado, the green engine stealing hearts away.

There will be lots and lots of homes, zero-carbon, of course, based on German and Swedish, rather than English, precedent and connected by footpaths and cycleways around a determinedly uninspired park. There will be a National Skills Academy for sports and leisure industries, rock concerts, an "Olympic university" and other things. What things? Well, you know, small, environmentally friendly things. Anyway, it will all be "world class", or about as enticing as a bowl of cold porridge.

I wonder if it has occurred to these London Olympians, so different in stature and ambition from York's, that the seeds of a truly worthwhile legacy are in the very soil of Stratford and along the banks of the river Lea that flows lugubriously through it. The site chosen for the 2012 Austerity Olympics was, until 1991, home to the Stratford railway works, founded in 1847. It held the record for high-speed manufacturing; in 1891, one of James Holden's 0-6-0 freight locomotives was built here in nine hours and 47 minutes. It went straight into service and ran more than 1.2 million miles over the following 44 years.

Stratford and the Lea Valley were, in fact, the cradle of a second industrial revolution, with Britain at its forefront. Up the river Lea, companies like Avro and Hawker Siddeley got Britain into the air. Here, in 1904, Ambrose Fleming invented the diode valve, a key to the development of radio, television, computers and the internet. The first radio valves were made here, and the first television tubes emerged 20 years later. Aero-engines and custom-designed London buses were made in Walthamstow. Lee-Enfield rifles were made here, too.

If we were serious about creating a legacy from the Olympics, we would do everything we could to establish the latest forms of manufacturing here. We might, of course, even choose to build the next generation of high-speed trains here. Such industry would mean young people learning valuable and enjoyable skills, a future workforce with responsible and uplifting jobs, and a solid economic base on which to build a post-financial services dependent economy.

Sadly, British politicians tend to have little care for manufacturing, railways and British jobs. Yesterday the Prince of Wales evoked the spirit of a manufacturing and design legacy we could have - in ultra-modern form - but which we will reject as a matter of course in favour of unimaginative, posturing "urban regeneration", which will see the East End of London little better off than before - collectively stacking the shelves of Hadean supermarkets rather than building the modern equivalent of the Olympian Tornado.

• Jonathan Glancey is the Guardian's architecture critic jonathan.glancey@guardian.co.uk

guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2009 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments